• DharkStare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    240
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    It’s such an alien thought process that I don’t even know where I would begin with discussing politics with such a person.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        126
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        9 days ago

        No, this is the voter she pissed off Dem voters for…

        It didn’t work out well if you’ve already forgotten.

        If someone says trump is Hitler but they voted for him anyways…

        Then he was already going to vote for trump, and chasing his vote just led to losing traditional Dem voters with literally no gain.

        Moving to the right is political suicide, yet we keep doing it because that’s how you max donations. And that’s all the people running the party care about.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          49
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          No, this is the voter she pissed off Dem voters for…

          Not sure why you said “no”, since you’re making the same point I was. This is who the party asked her to sway, and now the party is blaming her for not working hard enough to win the votes of complete fucking morons.

          I could have told you that ignoring these morons and running a campaign focused on the working class, social justice, and economic fairness would have gone 1000% farther than trying to win over fence-sitters during the most divided election in U.S. history. Not sure why the Democrats ignored this, I assume they have at least one competent advisor that said this…

          • hobovision@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            I think I interpreted it the same way the original commenter did, but I see now we’re all on the same page.

            Maybe instead of saying she was “supposed to” it would be more clear you meant her campaign was “trying to”.

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 days ago

            They said “no” because to them, the most important thing is blaming Kamala for whatever happened in some way. They’re disagreeing with you because you didn’t do that, and trying to correct you on it.

            You blamed the voter, which was the right response. I would expand that to include blaming the obviously Russian-influenced campiagn, however it happened, that convinced this person that Ukraine was a hugely important issue in this campaign in this particular bizarre way.

            We can give some blame to Kamala for her messaging, sure. But the thing you didn’t do, that made them say “no,” was redirect the whole conversation into a conversation about how it’s all Kamala’s fault and nothing else.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Well if the right are the only ones who constantly vote then yes they well change their views. Doesn’t matter if 2/3 of the country are Democrats if they can’t be bothered to get off their asses and vote.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah, the people running the party didn’t see that they lost the left wing vote, they only care about who voted and not for them.

        • mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          ok but… the Democrats in swing states (hell, any state) who said “I’m staying home because Kamala courts Republicans, even though I know Trump is Hitler” are absolutely as shitty as the people who voted for Trump

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            So?

            What matters is winning elections.

            Stomping our feet and saying they should do what we tell them isn’t fucking working.

            So if you want them to vote D so together we can stop Rs…

            Maybe we should try running a better candidate than we have been?

            Maybe no matter how much the wealthy insist on it, just being slightly better than trump isn’t enough.

            Maybe we should just run the best candidate we can, one that already agrees with Dem voters so we don’t have to ask millions of people to hold their nose?

            The excuse for running candidates further to the right then Dem voters has always been that it would magically win an election.

            It hasn’t, and it won’t.

            It’s a bad strategy and we’ve stuck with it for about a decade longer than we should have already.

            What logical reason can you give to stick with a plan that even when it works doesn’t get us as much as we need, and fails regularly?

            As a bonus, the more Dems move right, the more Republicans do.

            So every election Dem voters have their potential winnings reduced and potential loses increased…

            And people are really surprised why turnout was low?!

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        You mean by hanging out with Liz Cheney and talking about a ‘lethal military’?

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well he speaks English, same as you. I guess you could always meet a conservative and then ask them questions sometime. Might be a mind blowing experience to talk to someone who disagrees with you, and actually listen.

      • A7thStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I have listened, and there is nothing worth listening to. I have to listen, because there are all around me at work. It is continuous fear and ignorance. Not a single worthwhile thing. I’m done listening, especially since they won’t return the favour. I’m not going to meet hate in the middle.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        Can you promise me there will be something other than lies or misinformation coming out of their mouths when I do so this time? Because based on my first hand experience over at least the past 8 years, those are the only two things I’m going to get.

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’ve met plenty of Tories and their ilk, but none of them would vote for someone they publicly think is basically Hitler.

        This bloke’s thought processes are so alien to us they I don’t think we’ll ever understand him, sadly.

  • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    “the greatest argument against democracy is a conversation with the average voter”

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s already more than any communist regime allowed, so lesser of two evils and all of that…

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s one of the many often attributed to Winston Churchill, though to my knowledge there’s no actual evidence of him actually saying it and his other writings go against the sentiment. I don’t know who actually did say it first

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        As others put, no, but it does remind me that Aristotle felt society should only be run by the most intelligent among us, hence the term Aristocracy.

        Of course, in practice people make up bullshit rules to determine who is most intelligent and that messes up the whole concept (e.g. Jim Crow tests and such). But it’s a nice fantasy if ever we could pull it off.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          If only Aristocracy actually meant society was run by the most intelligent among us. Instead, it means “society is run by me and my buddies.”

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Even if it was actually the most intelligent they would still have the power to hurt others for their own gain. In fact I imagine it would be far easier for them to justify to themselves by arguing merit.

          The problem is that no government can thrive as a force for good in the face of apathy, maliciousness, or a lack of duty.

          • taiyang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Pretty much, yes. Even if you put up requirements on a democracy to require basic civic understanding, you ultimately disenfranchise a group.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Exactly and many people have misguided understanding of duty to country and the benefits that come from it. In rural America you often see people who treat military service as absolutely vital to preservation of freedom, and gun ownership as critical to preventing tyranny, but don’t see that jury duty and consistently participating in the political process with an open mind for all people’s right to live as they feel is right for themselves as the absolute lynchpins of American freedom that they are.

              Protecting freedom isn’t glorious, it isn’t exciting. It’s hard mental and emotional labor that requires resisting demagoguery and bigotry even when you’re struggling. It requires understanding that giving the government unchecked power will eventually bite you in the ass, just as surely as refusing to prosecute leaders who commit crimes. It requires paying your damn taxes so the country doesn’t fall into disrepair. It involves paying the prices required of the freedoms you have.

              It annoys me how some people refuse to vote lest they be called to jury duty. Motherfucker, trial by a jury of your peers is a magnificent right you hold, and that’s the price of it. Also you hold a portion of a nuclear arsenal and can’t even be bothered to find out that that’s not how the government that holds them works, or to express your will on it regardless.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    It’s like people really believe America entered WW2 to fight fascism becaus Americans are innately good…

    Large amounts of the country said the same shit this guy is. They wanted to either stay out of it or outright join the nazis.

    Especially the wealthy. Prescott Bush was believed to be part of the Business Plot that wanted to overthrow the US government in favor of fascism and doing the Axis powers.

    They didn’t succeed (mostly because of Pearl Harbor) but his son became head of the CIA, VP, and then president. One of his sons also became president, and almost another one.

    If we don’t remember what history was really like, we’re doomed to keep being surprised when the same shit keeps happening.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Ya, CCCP started it all with Hitler, later on the USA was forced in to the war.

      Don’t forget.

      Edit, to clarify: the USA was forced into the war, later on, they didn’t enter voluntarily. The nazis and the soviets kicked off ww2 in 1939. Sorry for the confusion.

      Edit again:

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        9 days ago

        Ya, CCCP started it all with Hitler

        Whut?

        Is this an attempt at a joke or do you really believe that?

        It’s hard to tell these days when someone is just pretending

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          9 days ago

          Heard about the ribbentrop molotov pact?

          That was what kicked it all off.

          • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Alright, let’s clear this up. The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact wasn’t what brought the US into WWII. That pact was a non-aggression agreement between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed in August 1939, which allowed both powers to avoid fighting each other while they focused on expanding their influence in Europe. This agreement directly led to the invasion of Poland and the start of WWII in Europe, but it didn’t prompt US involvement.

            The US didn’t enter the war until December 1941, over two years later, after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. That was the actual catalyst. Up until then, despite plenty of pro-Nazi and anti-Nazi sentiments among the populace, the US had largely followed an isolationist policy, though they supported the Allies with programs like Lend-Lease to aid Britain. The US’s decision to go to war was mostly a response to Japanese aggression, and Germany’s declaration of war on the US shortly afterward sealed the deal for full US involvement in both the Pacific and European theaters.

            So yeah, the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact was important for starting the conflict in Europe, but it wasn’t why the US entered WWII.

            • Valmond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              I didn’t say it brought USA into the war, I said it was what kicked off ww2 and it was the fault of the soviets + nazi germany.

              You are correct, but you misunderstood me, or I wasn’t clear enough.

              Edit: I was not clear enough, I edited my post. In my mind the two things were separate, I just didn’t have the writing skills.

              • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                I didn’t say it brought USA into the war

                You literally did

                Ya, CCCP started it all with Hitler, the USA was forced in to the war.

                Now, perhaps this isn’t what you meant to say. It is, however, what you said

                • Valmond@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  It’s two things, separated by a comma. Like apples are green, I went to the doctor yesterday. Not very good writing I admit.

            • Valmond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              So splitting up poland and the baltics wasn’t what started ww2?

              Let’s hear your version.

                • Valmond@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  So it’s time for insults.

                  Yeah the great Soviet Union started off WW2 with Nazi Germany, like it or not. I know they don’t teach that in some countries and call it “the great patriotic war” instead. Yo know, to muddy the waters.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Tell me you are a racist piece of shit without telling me you are a racist piece of shit.

    I really believe that most Americans are dumb enough to be racist and just smart enough to know they shouldn’t say it. I can’t help but read all this apologism for Trump as thinly veiled, “I know he’s a weird guy, but thank God someone is finally going to do something about all the people that look different than me”.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      9 days ago

      Saying “I voted for Trump” is saying “I’m a racist piece of shit”. We can retire the “without saying” joke in this context.

    • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Also, misogynist. “I sont agree with his dictatorial views, but at least he’s got a dick!”

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Bingo. This guy is likely happy about the reports that twice as many black women than white women die in child birth and after RvW those numbers doubled. He’s probably happy when he hears about family seperation, people caught in immigration prisons for dozens of years, and on and on.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      9 days ago

      You mean that, try as you might, you just can’t accept any new information into your worldview?

  • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    9 days ago

    As a German, this the insane things our parents, grandparents and institutions warned us about. People begrudgingly accepted their lead in the hopes that “although it’s an authoritarian, maybe he will take care of our goals”. What followed was the cruelty of 1939 to 1945 and no one deserves to live through that, not even the idiots that got us in this mess.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      I desperately, desperately, hoped that Germans, Jews, and especially the few remaining holocaust survivors, could somehow articulate this in a way that would penetrate at some point during the past few years.

      Nope. We are literally doomed to repeat it.

      Without mentioning the name of the poster, I replied to a comment yesterday that said this:

      The only reason I voted for him was because we’re on the brink of WW3 and I thought he was truly the last hope of getting the wars settled. I’m scared, and I’m sorry, but shit is crazy right now. Trump at least has some relations with Russia and North Korea, that could potentially cool the pot. Feel free to tell me why I’m wrong, I’m open to discussion.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    9 days ago

    Dictators: famous for ending wars. We’ll never learn how many wars could have been prevented if only all countries had authoritarian leaders, too bad it’s never happened before.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    8 days ago

    In times past, I was fascinated by Hitler and WW2. It was a lifelong obsession that I had since childhood. But ever since the Trump era started it started to wane due to the fact that WW2 and Hitler just didn’t seem so distant anymore… the world felt like a repeat of what was happening in those days and looking up facts felt, in part, like learning more to understand what is happening now instead of about history.

    But if there is something that I need to point out is that Hitler was a SHIT leader. Germans and Germany ever since the Kaiser era were portrayed as hyperefficient and militaristic, and people then claim the Nazis were the same. They weren’t. Nazi bureaucracy was bullshit and most of their economic growth was based on plunder (initially from German Jews and other marginalized groups and later from other countries) and almost purely military build up. Germany actually lagged behind in technological build-up to most countries, despite the stereotypes of the Wunderwaffen of WW2 (Fritz-X bomb, the ME-262, etc), and industrially as any technology that didn’t have a direct military benefit was discarded. They didn’t even have any proper anti-biotics during the war!

    Even agriculture was fucked by the Germans. Despite the romanticization of the German peasantry and the countryside by the Nazis, they could not sustain their population at all. Most German food was imported, and they were preparing their population for harsh wartime rationing even before the war started. They fed their population almost entirely on stolen food from Poland, France, the Netherlands, and Ukraine. Also by killing a lot of people in the death camps they saved on food that way as well.

    People stereotype communist countries as having no food when they don’t realize that fascist nations just can’t feed their own folk. Nazi Germany wasn’t alone in having serious food problems. Imperial Japan couldn’t feed its own population and would have had widespread hunger if they didn’t start plundering China during the war.

    Hitler lead Germans and Germany into death and destruction and misery and mayhem. He did nothing good for Germany. None at all. Even towards the end of the war he would have been OK with the German people being genocided since if they were defeated by the barbarian orc-like Soviets and the mongrel Americans they were not the master race he thought they were and they deserved to die. There is a reason why he is remembered as one of the world’s greatest monsters.

    • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      I see where you’re coming from. Perhaps not as obsessed, but I always had a historical interest in the era until it became an alarming parallel to present day news. Most people do not know much about what went down in the pre-war period. They just have knee-jerk reactions to it. “Traditional values” were trending at the time, Nazism was marketed as the modern, cool choice. Education, administration and even scouting and chess clubs were Nazified at the time. I see it with the freaking MAGA hat everywhere nowadays. I just see it and say, fuck this is some Nazi Germany shit. To me now there are two kinds of people, those who see it, and those who don’t. People are so precious thinking that Germans went nuts with the mass murder shit and elected this guy, but themselves have been on the exact same track as Nazi Germany for years: idolizing a dangerous man without ever questioning him. Soon they will have no excuse either, only collective guilt. Some of us won’t be here to see it though, for one reason or another. I have pointed this out in my other comment: once fascists get hold of the state apparatus, there is no horror we can put past them.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        i think it’s at least in part because we have always been taught to see Hitler as a monster instead of a person. We dehumanised him and the entire nazi party so much for many it sounds like a myth instead of history, the take away seems simple - just don’t be a monster.

        The lesson was - some people are born evil

        Instead of - anybody can fall the wrong path and find themselves committing atrocities. Even your friends, even your family, even you

        i’ve been saying this for a long time - Hitler wasn’t a monster, he was human just like you and me, and that’s a hundred times more terryfing

        • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          Indeed, dehumanization of the Nazis made most people think they are immune both to similar propaganda and similar atrocities. They think that Hitler advertised the Holocaust to be elected. It was a war time state secret (although there was the “Hitler’s Prophecy” but no-one took it at face value).

          Hitler regime rose to power with the now familiar rhetoric: traditional values, family, order, capitalism, down with the trans degenerates, beat up leftists they poison the blood of our country.

          That is why Trump goes out so easily saying “Hitler mught have said that but in a very different way”. He didn’t. It was the same fucking way.

          Having said that, consider how the “abstractio ad Hitlerum” advertized as a fallacy actually enabled, eventually, Trump to get away with Hitler shit, just by saying it is a fucking fallacy. (I think this is in turn called the “Fallacy fallacy”) This timeline is history repeating itself as a farce, exactly as Marx predicted.

          • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            I feel for some Nazi-like propaganda in times past, and I am PISSED at the people who tricked me and I will never forgive them. They weren’t born evil in some nefarious manner, I will agree, but they did fall for the same shit that anyone can fall for. This was the critical lesson that most people forget.

            Also the depiction of Nazi Germany as this hyperadvanced tech nation also played a role in it. While the Germans did have some very interesting secret weapon projects, people don’t realize the following:

            1: They were in trial stages and were often rushed into production well before the underlying technology was sufficient to make them operational. Meaning they would NOT have been able to turn the tide of the war no matter what.

            2: The Germany military was seriously lacking in many BASIC components. They didn’t have enough trucks and automobiles to do most of their shit. The Americans were fully mechanized, on the other hand and had FAR more of the nuts and bolts needed to win the war.

            3: Much of the secret weapons they tried to make were wastes of time and resources. If they had put their efforts onto the stuff that is needed to win they might have held out for longer, but their failure was their attempt to win by a magic bullet instead of real bullets.

            4: The Allies also had their own secret weapons projects that were just as funky and cool as the Axis. The Allies had jets and radar controlled stuff, too (and need I mention THE ATOMIC BOMB!). The Allies even had operational jet fighter squadrons during the war, but they didn’t throw them at the enemy. Even the Soviet Union, a backwards nation compared to the UK and the US, had their own secret weapons projects, too. But Stalin, like Roosevelt and Churchill, realized that the war would not be won by magic bullets, but real bullets, and focused more on getting the basic needs of the military done.

            In short the Nazis weren’t any more advanced with their tech. Their attempted use of fancy shit was done out of desperation and not an sign of better thinking.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        It seems like people as a whole are very generational. Meaning that there’s a generation that struggles, one that succeeds, and one that takes it for granted and fails.

        Then the cycle repeats.

        Im not talking about strictly boomers to x to z, but in a broad sense.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yup. I have a similar argument before. If one reads more about Hitler and the Nazis, they are actually not different to any of the standard third world dictators like Idi Amin and Muammar Gaddafi. The difference is that the Nazis were only more powerful because they inherited a working institution-- especially the Prussian-based military-- while third world countries had to start from scratch after decolonisation.

      The Nazis like other dictators are very inefficient. I am reading Hannah Arendt’s “Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil”. The book goes through the convoluted bureaucracy and logistics of the Holocaust. Different pen pushers and administrators arguing who should be able to use the trains for their own departmental needs. What struck me the most is that the Nazis wasted so much effort transporting so-called undesirables to concentration camps, when their own soldiers are struggling to get supplies and reinforcements to the frontlines!

      More importantly, as you correctly mentioned, Nazi Germany struggled to feed their own people. As a matter of fact, there is strong evidence that Hitler started the war in Europe to stave off the looming economic crisis, which his own economic minister warned him of, thanks to endless government spending particularly with the re-armement. That economic crisis had been warded (temporarily of course) by plundering the resources of their conquered territories.

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        The one scary thing about the holocaust is that while it did cause some problems in shipping supplies as you mentioned, it actually didn’t cost that much at all and even produced a profit. If I had to point to the ultimate evil of capitalism I wouldn’t point to the massive wasted food or environmental destruction. I would point to the death camps. They were remarkably cheap to run all things considered AND they paid for themselves AND made a profit.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          On short term the Nazis may have profited, but on the long term, all the potential talents were killed and brain drain occurred even before the war.

          • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Absolutely. The nazis would have destroyed everything. George Orwell in his review of Mein Kampf noted that the only thing that Hitler seemed to have in mind for German culture is literally taking over land, breeding a new generation of soldiers for them to to go war again and again and again. Just a repeat of that. No culture, no real anything other than spreading themselves far and wide.

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      There were over 40 assassination attempts on the shit stain Hitler and all of them were domestic. The Allies fully understood who was responsible for Germany’s strategic and tactical failures and they wanted the turd alive until the end. Cadet Bone Spurs will do the same thing to the US military.

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I remember in 2016 thinking how similar Trump was to Hitler and rhetoric and everything. I was written off is basically being nothing but hyperbole and physical form unfortunately I wasn’t wrong which sucks

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean it’s only because they didn’t give him exactly what he wanted and how he wanted it immediately and without any resistance that we got the war. He was the real oppressed one after all /s /s /s /s

      Because I cannot emphasis enough that what I said above is sarcasm.

  • vordalack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    9 days ago

    “I voted for the guy that I think is like Hitler to end conflicts and keep us out of wars.”

    Did he not read the part where Hitler genocided Jews, Europeans, and the disabled?

    Did he not read the part in history where Hitler caused a war so large that it wiped out entire European families, literally tens of millions of Europeans?

    The white working class in this country is going to get everything they voted for. I hope Trump floods their neighborhoods with immigrants, LEGALLY.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      The thing to keep in mind about idiocy is that idiots make mistakes, a lot. At the same time, those mistakes are usually small-stakes affairs (it’s hard to make big mistakes with no money and/or resources) and are usually recoverable. The idea that their mistake could affect so many others simply does not happen, because that’s not how things typically work.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Did he not read the part where Hitler genocided Jews, Europeans, and the disabled?

      That’s the thing though — Hitler didn’t run on a platform of genociding people, he ran on a platform of economic improvement. Weimar Germany was economically depressed and many average people and families were suffering from unemployment and financial hardship while the rich were relatively unaffected and enjoying themselves. Hitler promised to change that (and in all fairness, he did). The genociding Jews part came much later.

      Hitler was in charge of Germany for 11 years (1934-1945) — the war didn’t start until 1938, and the holocaust only began in 1942, so the voters DID end up getting at least 4 years of relative peace and prosperity. Also, keep in mind that Hitler was 45 years old when he became chancellor, meanwhile Trump is 78, meaning even if he manages to finish his second tenure successfully, he’ll very likely simply be too old by the end of it in order to continue, which makes it somewhat unlikely that he’ll attempt to stage another coup in order to remain dictator for life.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Possible, but Vance doesn’t exactly strike me as Hitler 2.0. I watched his Joe Rogan interview and he came off as a pretty reasonable guy.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Vance is an opportunist, and dangerously smart and eloquent. That’s actually a huge positive over Trump, I really hate we have such an actual gullible idiot in office.

            Problem is I don’t really understand what is actual political beliefs are. It feels like he’s just a sycophant in interviews, given his history.

            He’s hitched himself to the MAGA train, but if, say, he was president with basically no opposition and Trump dead, what would he do?

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    8 days ago

    Ya know… if I thought someone was literally Hitler, the last thing I’m gonna fucking do is help them literally have control of… everything.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      But what if the country needed a change in leadership after recently being fucked up by this hitler guy, eh?

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Unless you want to bring about the end of the world. Seriously, that’s how at least some of these people think. They want to throw a monkey wrench in the works, because they think they’ll be the ones to survive the apocalypse.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Trump won’t bring about the apocalypse he’ll just bring about economic ruin. Which is a lot less fun than the apocalypse.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I want the end of the world too, but it’s because I don’t wanna survive the apocalypse, we are not the same.

        Haha… I’m depressed.

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Everyone keeps looking for answers to why trump won. I keep coming back to media directed stupidity

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      And social media feeds.

      How much you wanna bet this guy scrolls facebook a ton? Or listens to railing radio/podcasts on drives? This opinion didn’t spawn from a vacuum.

      They should be following up and asking him where he got those ideas.

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, media, social or mass, has guided the people incapable of sound reasoning exactly where they wanted them.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I’m beginning to see why he is a former construction worker.

    This guy was fired for being obviously mentally unstable.

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Oh, far from it. This is very much the norm in any construction sector. Everyone is dumb as absolute fuck.

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 days ago

        Historical fact: In the distant past, guys like this belonged to a Union, and the union told them how to vote.

        The union was led by ruthless people whose power was entirely dependent on the support of the union.

        The union leaders kept their people happy by negotiating better prices for their labor, and the happy people did what the leaders said. Their tribe was the union, and the tribe stuck together.

        At some point the owner class realized it was easy to redefine what happiness meant for idiots: Lying. A lot. Tricking absolute idiots is easy, so they started whittling away at unions with promises of prosperity a union leader could never fulfil, until we get to today where unions and union membership is lower than it’s ever been.

        And idiots like that still vote for who their handler tells them to, only their handler now has zero investment in keeping them happy. Lying to them is sufficient as long as the rest of the tribe reinforces the lies. The tribe is now everyone too stupid to not vote for Hitler, and the tribe sticks together.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          The tribe is now everyone too stupid to not vote for Hitler, and the tribe sticks together.

          And the tribe is 70+ million strong. Let’s not forget that.

    • Aneb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Acting like that would be his first fraud. Or the only fraud in this election. Trump is moving pawns behind every state election, and he has 5 Ace’s up his phony sleeve. Its all crooked when Trump is involved

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Convicted felons can vote in Florida, but a woman can’t get an abortion after 6 weeks, which is right when a lot of them realize they’re pegrenate. Well isn’t that special.