• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He changed his tune in a later arbitration case with Netflix, where he claimed that not only was the money contractually his to do with what he pleased, but Netflix owed him more than $14 million in unpaid invoices.

    The absolute sack on this guy lmao

    • clearedtoland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll do it for just $500K and it’ll be a series about a man (me, extra savings on casting) wildly misspending the money battling a capitalist society run amok by paying off his mortgage and student loans. Episodes are about 30 secs to 1 min, depending how long the payment sites take to load.

    • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Netflix had in 2023 roughly 247 Million paying user (they say). Blowing 50 Mil. is like 0.20$ for every user. It was mostly a mix of inflation, greed and shareholder demand for profit increase (also greed) that made you pay now more, for barely the same service/product.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        *worse service

        The crackdown on sharing accounts didn’t personally affect me, but it was still one of the reasons I dropped it

        • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I got annoyed that the price kept going up and the quality of the shows went down, or there was just too much crap to filter out in order to watch something good. A lot of shows I like would randomly get cancelled, like Kim’s Convenience, Altered Carbon and others I can’t think of now.

  • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When Netflix acquiesced and wired the money, Rinsch sent most of it directly to his personal Charles Schwab account, and made big bets on biotech firm Gilead Sciences, and on shorting the S&P 500 index. In just a few weeks he’d lost $5.9 million. Cutting his losses, Rinsch pulled $4 million from his Schwab account and put it directly into Dogecoin. Wow, such invest.

    Hahaha they gave $millions to a guy from r/wallstreetbets

  • li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    The guy’s obviously mentally ill, but sounds like the only reason he ever got that much money was because of a bidding war.

    Stupid companies not looking at what they’re investing in, and just copying each other to try and get what the other wants 🤦‍♂️

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Must have been those big smart “decision makers” that figures this one out.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re doing this with everything now. Corporate trends are deciding “Return to Office” a decade after jumping on the Work from Home bandwagon. They’re all moving to “unlimited” PTO, because people use less on average than an allotted account, and they can monitor and punish anyone who uses more.

      It’s almost like the MBAs are trained to just follow each other.

    • HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stupid companies not looking at what they’re investing in

      I bet there’s some assistant out there working under some Netflix production exec going I fucking knew it

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think unproven director is the issue here

    How does he move it all to a personal account?

  • Jakdracula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    They will spend $500k to make a documentary about this, pump it up to hit #1, and at the end of the day net the same results: $55.5 million spent to have the #1 show.

    • Jyrdano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Judging by the story in the article, the doc would be hundred times more interesting than the nonexistent tv show anyway.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It won’t even touch them. It will come out of the pockets of lower level employees or future projects.

    • Blackout@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      This just means they get to cancel a few of their good shows now. Their favorite thing to do.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey Netflix, I’m available too to make a sci-fi series. I’m an unproven director who can put something together for only like… $50 million. Totally worth your money.

    • StarManta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      And get what money? The money’s spent, it’s gone, and the directors not getting another big payday like this ever again. They can spend $10k on lawyers to get the $216 in his checking account.

      • gnurd@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Article says it’s in arbitration so it’s not like they aren’t doing anything about it. And one can assume they’re still paying their lawyers quite a bit during the arbitration. Also the person can be forced to sell off assets to pay for damages.

        Also at the end of the article it says he pulled out 27 million he made in doge coin from 4 million he invested of Netflix’s money.

    • gnurd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The article says it’s in arbitration which is basically the same thing, sans an actual court.

    • driving_crooner
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they have insurance over the project and can recover some of the money. The company I work for sell this kind of insurance, but is usually for construction projects.