• SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Idk, I feel like if it’s total population of zones almost everywhere is at a disadvantage to London. If it’s champions style and there’s a set number of people in the brawl, definitely 13.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    30 days ago

    10 has Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds. I reckon the only real challenge would be 13 but combining forces they could take Glasgow and then pick of any lone Highland madman.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      If the women from 13 get involved, 13.

      They will be using readily available objects as weapons however.

        • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Ah yes, following the rules in a fight… famously well-behaved Scots women.

          As Mad Jock MacAdder once described the old highland way of women fighting: “bare breasted and each carrying an eight pound baby!”

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      10 has a huge numerical advantage over Glasgow, and we could counter their casuals with Mancunian spiceheads. The scousers could be a liability or an asset, but then someone has to stand at the front and get mown down by the initial Highland berzerker charge.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        The scousers could be a liability or an asset, but then someone has to stand at the front and get mown down by the initial Highland berzerker charge.

        A phalanx of Bootle smackheads would be like trying to punch through a horde of the zombies. No weapons for headshots means the Scots would wear themselves out. If they bought a supply of methadone, they’d probably be able to turn a few too.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    A united England could only take a divided Scotland by marrying into it.

    The outcome is clear, Scotland sweeps then starts fighting itself.

  • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Northern Ireland doesn’t get its own zone because the outcome would be too obvious otherwise.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      That was largely done with good old bribing people to be on your side, its also how we got the British empire as it basically started with paying various groups in India to fight eachother which is what allowed the British to conquer a nation that was far wealthier and more powerful at the time.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    Sorry to break to you all, but it already happened. That’s why No. 1 is in charge.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    I object to having Nottingham in my group those guys would be more of a hindrance than anything else.

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    28 days ago

    East anglia would win on account of being able to punch with all six fingers.