• GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Pop is just as manufactured and fake as it always was, with the exceptional trend setter or two doing their own thing, but what’s just below the surface is always just as good as it always was.

    As a fan of hardcore, electronica, folk, metal, and all of the genres that fall under them, I still get new bands. I still get new releases. I get cheap as fuck concerts and still get cool merch and awesome vinyls. I have zero to complain about. Hell, Primus, A Perfect Circle and Puscifer just made an album together, in 2024.

    Anyone who says music sucks now doesn’t really listen to that much music to start with. Music is just fine, man. Maybe look a little deeper than the pudding skin.

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I hear you and agree with much of that. I am a fan of multiple genres as well. But, as far as it goes for jazz, jazz is dead. Anyone still attempting to play it is often a sad version of what was once great in the 50s/60s/70s. So while there’s plenty of music in other genres I like, always more to find from those time periods, as well as still enjoying the classics, it’s a little upsetting good jazz is dead, modern jazz is trash, and people who think they know jazz these days actually refer to some other genre, like rock. Somewhat sad.

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Ugly people are still making it, pop acts have just figured out that if you make a pretty person pretend to sing it it sells better.

  • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yea that’s why metal fuckin rules. We got the ugliest guys ever altogether in one room and said “what you got?” and they became legends

    And for anyone that might say that doesn’t happen anymore, I ask: how many open mic nights or $20 shows have you been to lately? The scene is doing great in my area, but it doesn’t happen by magic. Ya gotta support it, spread the word, bring your friends.

    • arefx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      More of a hardcore guy myself but we’re equally as ugly so I stand in solidarity

    • Mbourgon everywhere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, no kidding. I just bought tickets for a $15 show that has multiple bands and included a overseas band. I mentioned to them that they should’ve upped the prices to $20.

      Also: Sturgeon‘s law still applies: “90% of everything is crap“. Music is so amazingly easy to make these days you can do it on your phone (and I believe a Grammy nominated/winning album did so). Which means that there are literally thousands of albums every year, And so there will be a lot of crap. But between Bandcamp and Spotify and SoundCloud (and so on, even self-hosting), this is the freaking plutonium age if you like new music. There is literally so much that you can’t possibly keep up with it, even in sub genres. And there are some amazing gems coming out daily

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most of my favorite artists are beautiful tho… Mikael Akerfeldt, Alexi Laiho (RIP), Devin Townsend, Shagrath…

  • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not really related to that stupid boomer post, but ho crazy is it that that ugly british lady won music star or popstar or whatever and everyone was like: oh my god this is insane, ugly people can do things? They are almost like real people.

  • Graphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Ugly people make music all the time.

    You really gonna tell me Ed Sheeran is good looking? Post Malone?

    • swim@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      But the contention is about music being better, and that’s some bad music.

      • Graphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Did we read the same post?

        Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it

        I guess your comment makes sense if you find those two attractive.

        Like I get the boomer joke of music these days sucks but my comment was leaning into joke.

        • swim@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Your comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post.

          The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.”

          Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.