interesting article for consideration from Polygon writer Kazuma Hashimoto. here’s the opening:

In February, Final Fantasy 16 producer Naoki Yoshida sat down in an interview with YouTuber SkillUp as part of a tour to promote the next installment in the Final Fantasy series. During the interview, Yoshida expressed his distaste for a term that had effectively become its own subgenre of video game, though not by choice. “For us as Japanese developers, the first time we heard it, it was like a discriminatory term, as though we were being made fun of for creating these games, and so for some developers, the term can be something that will maybe trigger bad feelings because of what it was in the past,” he said. He stated that the first time both he and his contemporaries heard the term, they felt as though it was discriminatory, and that there was a long period of time when it was being used negatively against Japanese-developed games. That term? “JRPG.”

  • Pixel@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure I agree, to me the difference between JRPG and RPG is like the difference between anime and animation. In a western audience, the label has been coopted by games closer to home with tropes we’re more familiar with. That doesn’t make the labeling of Japanese media othering in that sense, so much as it allows us to understand what contexts it is both from and for.

    I can see how, to some people, it might be a turn-off (just see all the people that turn their nose up at anime conceptually even if they’d like it) – see the people that may have seen edge of tomorrow in theaters and enjoyed it, but would likely sneer at being told to read all you need is kill, differences in media notwithstanding. But as the media landscape changes and grows it’s useful to have different ways to sort of illustrate the differences in audience as well as the differences in creative context.

    • 836man@feddit.jp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there a possibility that the usage of anime is also othering? In Japan, “anime” means animation, and if you ask a Japanese person what their favorite anime is, they might say Disney movies. If you translate “anime” into Japanese, it will become “Japanese anime”

      However, it seems that there are some animators who think that there is a difference between anime and animation.

  • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is interesting because I can see where he’s coming from, but like others I see it as more of a distinct genre from Western RPG. There is no general RPG genre which a game can be categorized as to represent “the norm” which jrpgs are aberrant from. That being said, labelling western rpgs and jrpgs doesn’t indicate the design philosophy which is actually indicated by those terms. The west has produced many jrpgs and Japan has produced many western rpgs, and that doesn’t make sense unless you know what those terms actually mean.

    I wonder what these genres could be called which would be better indicators? Dragon Quest-likes and Ultima-likes?

  • Quentinp@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a way to communicate what you expect from a game not some conspiracy to brand all Japanese RPGs lol. Like saying a game is a soulslike or roguelike. I mean Elden Ring is sort of an RPG and never heard anyone call it a JRPG. For JRPG I expect, anime art style, party system, turn based combat, probably a lot of drama lol.

  • mint@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a very valid point that I don’t care about Yoshi “Black People can’t exist in FFXVI”-P bringing up lol

    • exohuman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yuck, I just looked up his statements about that. Yeah, I don’t know if I will be playing FFXVI. There are plenty of games that don’t have that problem. Diablo 4 is a good example.

      • Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have, in fact, talked to people who are insistent that any RPG made in Japan is a JRPG and any game not made in Japan isn’t. They argued that Dark Souls is a JRPG. They were entirely serious.

        • GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve met such people before.

          I disagree with them though, as the tropes and presentation of a game are more pertinent to genre labels, than is the nationality of its creators. There are many western-made JRPGs, and there might even be Japanese-made WRPGs as well.

        • Lumi@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dark Souls is a JRPG

          Did they also argue that a hot dog is a sandwich?

  • exohuman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There was a time JRPG meant anime characters and clicking through lots of text to get through the story. Also, the “role playing” portion of the story usually went around characters that were hard wired into the game with no customization beyond their name. That’s changing for a lot of games, but the classic JRPG still survives. Maybe the classic kind of JRPG just needs a new name to avoid “othering”.

    • ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “J” isn’t othering any more than any other genre modifier. It sets up my expectations for what type of RPG it is, just like a “C” does. It also doesn’t mean that the game comes from Japan, because Sea of Stars looks to be a JRPG, and Anachronox already was back in the day; it just means it’s the Japanese style, which is neither inherently good or inherently bad.

      • GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For what it’s worth, I’ve found myself (and others) using “WRPG”. I’ve heard “CRPG” before but I feel that it’s even more confusing than the already-confusing geography-based labels.

  • Sentinian@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I totally understand this devs point, it’s kinda hard to separate this genre from the name at this point. I’d happily ditch JPRG in a heartbeat but it doesn’t have a good alternative. Turn based doesn’t describe all games that fit in that genre and can be mixed up with card games and such. Calling it a FF or Pokémon clone would be worse imo.

    Typically I tend to just skip genres in general for all media. It’s really all fluff and I find the best media tend to blur the line between so many genres that you can’t describe it easily.

    • GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve heard some people try to use “eastern RPG” instead, but I’m not sure it’s caught on.

      For what it’s worth, “western RPG” (or “WRPG”) seems to have caught on; some people call this style “computer RPG” or “CRPG”, but I’d say that even more inaccurate of a label. So yeah, WRPGs and JRPGs.

      And meanwhile, we also have action RPGs, which can be subdivided into games that are more similar to something like Diablo (action WRPGs) vs. games that are more similar to something like Ys (action JRPGs).

      And then we have strategy RPGs. And then we have MMORPGs. And then we have dungeon crawlers. And then we have roguelikes, which are distinct from dungeon crawlers despite also involving going around a dungeon.

      Okay let’s be frank here, “role-playing game” itself was never a great name to begin with in the first place. There’s the famous comment that if you’re playing any Mario game you’re playing the role of Mario. But rather, “RPG” is just the broad umbrella for games that are descended, however distantly it may be, from D&D. Kinda. (I’ve heard that at one point Zelda 1 was called an “RPG”, though obviously the meaning of the term has become a little more specific since then.)

  • l0st-scr1b3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really shocked to read the reaction in these comments.

    People always get irate when someone points out that language they’ve been using for a long time is actually inherently problematic and perform all kinds of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting it.

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, I do understand that JRPG is somewhat problematic.

      The problems it’s not going to change because it’s too deeply ingrained, and if you try to introduce another term it’s just going to end up being either nobody understanding what you mean, or what is already happening where we try to briefly describe JRPGs as something else and people point to this other genre with that one mechanic that is still massively different from JRPGs.

      Like we could just say “Dragon Quest-Clone”, or “Final Fantasy-Clone”, or “pokemon clone” but that’d be significantly more insulting to devs I feel, but really what people want are the kind of turn-based combat you’d see in Pokemon, Earthbound or Final Fantasy. But like the only way it’s changing 30 years later is if you use a term that’s much more “There’s no way you don’t know what this is” than JRPG.

    • DaSaw@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can’t determine the meaning of a word or phrase just by interpreting its linguistic roots. Yes, Dark Souls is Japanese, and a Role Playing Game (I guess; I haven’t played it), but the term “JRPG” doesn’t merely mean “Japanese Role Playing Game”. It refers to a particular style of game that, until quite recently, was exclusively made in Japan. This is what puts the “J” in “JRPG”, but the term wasn’t invented to split Japanese RPGs off from other RPGs just because they were Japanese (as the linked article suggests). There’s really no reason to do that. If that’s all it was, we’d just say “RPG”. It was invented to describe a particular aesthetic that was very distinct relative to other CRPGs.

      I can see the logic behind redefining the Legend of Zelda as a JRPG. That said, it would have been an invalid classification at the time, as there was a world of difference between something like Dragon Quest and something like The Legend of Zelda, and the entire point to the acronym “RPG” was to distinguish the two. Weirdly, we called LoZ an “adventure game”, though there is no relationship between the term “adventure game” on the console scene, which described what we would now call an “Action RPG”, and “adventure game” on the PC, which described what we would now call by names like “Object Hunt” and “Visual Novel”. Words are weird, and their meanings can’t be deduced simply by breaking apart their linguistic roots.

    • Otome-chan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      >calling zelda an action-rpg
      >calling zelda a jrpg

      this is worse than the “a hotdog is a sandwich” thing.

        • Otome-chan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hate when people do that. like no, just because you play a role in a game doesn’t mean it’s a rpg. though honestly genre names are so horribly named. like wtf even is an “action adventure”? aren’t most games adventures where there’s action?

          • thingsiplay@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Correct. But the genre names usually have a history how they originated. Problem is, while the games changes, the names of genres did not. It’s a mess. To be honest, it was a mess from the beginning, but it got worse over time.

            I personally see “genres” like tags grouping a game in a few words. With the possibilities and variety of games of today and the ancient genre names of the past, classifying games based on a single genre name does not workout always, especially with terms as broad as Action/Adventure. We even have genres or “game types” named after games titles, such as “Metroidvania”, “Souls-like” or even “Breath-like” (yeah, some use that term too…).

            Some even classify GTA as a racing game; it’s ridiculous! But on the other hand, sometimes genres are descriptive of what the game is about to a certain degree “Fighting”, “Racing” or “MOBA” are examples of useful groups. That does not mean games can’t be classified in multiple groups (hence why I said it makes most sense to use these like tags).

  • corm@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems kinda whiny. I’ve never heard jrpg used in a bad way.

    I’d like to see a poll or something to hear if most japanese devs feel this way. I bet it’s just a vocal whiny minority.

    I love jrpgs, chrono trigger is one of the best games ever made, and I’ve put a big chunk of my life into dragon quest games.

    • GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      JRPGs definitely did get dunked on sometime within the past couple decades. There was definitely commentary going around about how JRPGs were somehow bad because they’re too linear and tended to have too many similar story tropes/character archetypes and random battles were bad, yadda yadda. Some people even speculated that the genre was dying out. (That prediction obviously turned out to be wildly inaccurate.)

      I guess it could be argued that some people did dunk on it for culture-specific reasons, especially for the anime art.

  • delnac@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t think his position is reasonable. JRPG does describe an RPG subgenre, just like CRPG or ARPG do. They have specific formats, structures and tropes that they all adhere to religiously.

    He also omits the fact that not all RPGs coming out of Japan are called that. Once they stray enough from the trope of the genres, they are no longer included in it. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck…

    Finally, acting as if people have a racist or discriminatory slight against those games because of the term… I don’t think I’ve ever seen people do that, other than disliking the general style and anime aesthetic which is entirely fair?

    I don’t get him.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also not all JRPGs are developed in Japan, and not all RPGs developed in Japan are JRPGs.

      It just happened that the subgenre started out in Japan.