Missouri is the state that tried to prosecute a reporter for viewing the source code of a website. They don’t send their best.
https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/15/missouri_html_hacking/
What an idiot. Does not even know the basic laws of the country he is working for. The US really needs a mandatory intelligence test for politicians, and exclude anyone below e.g. 80, even if that would kill the GOPs presence in politics.
“we will be subpoenaing information on Google’s algorithms and other systems to determine whether they are censoring conservative speech.”
Good luck with your crash course in data science and machine learning, Missouri AG. In the past this has always turned out to be some kind of weighting towards probably-true content that disproportionately targets conservatives because they’re the ones spreading lies.
Every time I see Missouri mentioned in a national news/politics forum, even before I’ve read the whole post title, I get a sense of dread. Because it’s never anything good.
~(I currently reside in Missouri.)~
Wouldn’t it be lovely if the abortion amendment motivates enough people to vote these shitheads out of our government?
Would they just ignore it? Didn’t they do that with your marijuana amendment? Or something else. I just remember it being relatively recent.
It was the gerrymandering one they ignored. The cannabis one didn’t attack their power base and it is not something they directly controlled. I think the abortion one is more like the cannabis one.
Fuck those fascists.
GOOGL IS SENSURING TRUMP
I DEMAND EQUAL TREATMENT OF MY SHITTY ASS VIEWPOINTS
Fuck you, and fuck the GOP. Never does it say anywhere we have to like you.
…wrote on X… the irony is lost on them.
Oh look another little fat white guy defending Trump. Weird.
The Register - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Register:
Wiki: reliable - The Register is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles. Some editors say that The Register is biased or opinionated on topics involving Wikipedia.
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Ars Technica - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Ars Technica:
Wiki: reliable - Ars Technica is considered generally reliable for science- and technology-related articles.
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Why does everyone hate my shitty propaganda bot? Don’t people like being told what to think during election season?
That can’t be it. Wait, I got it!
I’ll just make the text larger and bold! That’ll fix it!
