• wischi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Because it’s simpler to build siphons through large valleys instead of 100 meter high 10 kilometer long aqueducts.

        • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          But you have to keep water pressure throughout the length of that tube, how did they do that with their materials?

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            They had metal working and also knew how to work clay. Plus finding water leaks isn’t difficult to know what specific points need attention, then you just add material until it stops leaking. The pipes might have been large enough to work from the inside if the flow was diverted.

            They also wouldn’t need a perfect seal, just a good enough seal that the majority of the water makes it to the other side.

            I’d bet that there were teams of people whose full-time job was to maintain each of the siphons rather than the more modern approach of “build it and then bury it under asphalt because it will probably be fine for years” plumbing takes today.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Valley was too deep for the aqueduct but they didn’t want to make the drawing taller just for that

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, but the water pipe goes back up meaning that there is near equal pressure on either side of the U-Siphon, right? Kind of negates the siphon, in a sense?

      I’m no fluid dynamics expert. Just a casual Joe.