Turns out the film prints weren’t destroyed after all:

Studio sources dispute a rumor that 70mm prints of “Interstellar” were destroyed; Paramount claims it has archived more copies of the movie than most other pictures. However, because reels of film experience wear and tear while playing on the big screen, it’s not uncommon for them to be unusable after their theatrical runs.

  • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    There is absolutely no way in God’s green Hell that Interstellar came out 10 shitting years ago. Are you slamming my penith in a car door right now?

  • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love this movie. I don’t particularly like McConaughey, or even in this, but I just really enjoy this movie.

    Although I do find it weird that he has no curiosity about the fate of his son, grandson etc

  • driving_crooner
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you tough that sequels where a plague in Hollywood, wait until you only have reboots on the cinema.