As many of you know, 80% of the Wehrmacht were stationed on the eastern front. And where did the Soviets decide to engage them? On the eastern front. If the soviet leadership had any regard for the lives of their soldiers, they would have engaged the Wehrmacht on the western front.

  • dumpster_dove [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    The smart thing would obviously have been to sit on the sidelines until the enemies wore themselves out fighting others, maybe send material support to the side that seemed to be losing so as many as possible are killed, then in 1944 you swoop in and reap the benefits of victory. That’s what the Soviets shoulda done.

    • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      Seen this argued unironically. You see, the soviets didn’t protect their industrial base as opposed to the US. Not being across an entire ocean against an enemy that has no real way to project naval power is a classic tactical blunder.

      • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        smuglord They coulda just dug a giant moat on their Western front. What? Could the USSR not figure out “shovel technology?” alphys-smug

    • novibe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s eerily similar to what this other US something nation did…