• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    No. Bust I’m not claiming such a thing exists either.

    You made that comment in response to:

    Humanist Democratic Socialism does. Communitarianism might also.

    … actually there’s probably forms of Distributism, that might. Just depends on whether we’re talking classic Communism with a one party centrally planned command economy (which is how a lot of people interpret the term still).

    Communism is just too broad an idea to agree to blindly, it could be referring to anything from a small scale communal farming co-op to a one party Authoritarian system.

    You’ll have to be more specific.

    I don’t see where that claims anything about the purity of any given system. In fact, all it does is ask for “What definition of communism are you using?”

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I said capitalism is at least better than communism. Everything else is words written for me.

        To be precise, you demanded an example of a ‘pure’ system that the original commenter made no pretensions of supporting, and when called out, you objected that you weren’t the one claiming that such a system existed, implying that the other commenter was (which is demonstrably untrue).

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            My original point is: Communism isn’t automatically good just because capitalism isn’t.

            I absolutely did not get that meaning from your comment at the top of this thread, which was:

            No, but It beats communism any day of the week.

              • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Ok, but that seems like a non sequitur. I don’t understand how your metaphor is supposed to help translate “[capitalism] beats communism any day of the week” into “communism isn’t automatically good because capitalism isn’t”. Those are two completely different statements.

                I think it would help me if you connected the dots more when you write things.