• SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Says can’t trust experts because they are clouded by ideology and bribed by industry quotes an judicial expert who’s entire job is to inject right wing ideology into the judicial branch while being motivated by bribes.

  • Frenchfryenjoyer (she/her)@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    What a pos. nobody is “pushing” these medicines on kids. it’s ultimately the kid’s decision about whether they want these medications or not and I’m not aware of any cases to the contrary. also these medications have been used for literal decades so how can they be experimental? how do you expect people to trust you when you lie so blatantly? glad he got banned.

    Happy Pride Month ❤️

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      also these medications have been used for literal decades so how can they be experimental?

      Honest answer: the drugs are being used off-label. It’s not even experimental, it’s basically a wildcat way of using them. An experiment would involve control groups and a double-blind trial, among other things.

      I’m saying this because this is what rightoids are saying as criticism and you need to be able to counter that with facts. Right now, there just isn’t enough information and that’s what they’re capitalizing on.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        there just isn’t enough information and that’s what they’re capitalizing on.

        40 years of using hormone blockers for precocious puberty. “Not enough info.” Fuck the whole way off.

        double-blind trial

        No. The data is fine. It doesn’t need to be perfect.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          This is the exact opposite of what the reports out of the UK, Netherlands, Sweden, etc. are saying. They’re all very seriously restricting their youth transitioning clinics because the quality of the available data is so poor it cannot be relied on. Beyond the replicability crisis, there are ideological actors on both sides making absolutely junk studies.

          Hence the need for proper experimental data.

          • foxglove (she/her)@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Yet they don’t revoke the use of puberty blockers for cis children with precocious puberty, they only are concerned about the lack of data for trans kids - it’s motivated by transphobia, not actual clinical concerns.

            Trans kids aren’t having poor outcomes from gender affirming care, quite the opposite actually - and the “we don’t have enough data” argument is a false concern used to plausibly deny a more than sufficiently demonstrated clinically safe and effective treatment.

            EDIT: might be interested in reading: https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-well-being-of-transgender-people/

            We should be clear, the medical establishment is not woke (quite the contrary, actually) nor is every single major medical association recommending gender affirming care for trans youth on ideological grounds or because they have been forced to by some LGBT+ lobbying, but because the evidence we have points to that care being life saving and effective while also being low risk and in the case of puberty blockers even reversible.

            EDIT2: you should also know the Cass Review has been found to be biased in its recommendations, e.g. this demand for high evidence in the case of trans care but not other areas of care have been pointed out as motivated by prejudice, might be worth reading more about the criticisms of the Cass Review:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Review#Reception_by_academics_and_researchers

            Several scholars and organisations have criticised the Cass Review’s conclusions and the evidence base used to support them. Researchers Cal Horton and Ruth Pearce have said of the Cass Review, “its most controversial recommendations are based on prejudice rather than evidence”. Cal Horton criticised the Interim Report and other documents for prioritising research on aetiology of trans identities, saying: “Research into the causation of trans identities has a pathologized history, running parallel to efforts to prevent or cure transness.” Cal Horton also criticised the Interim Report’s support of exploratory therapy and its use of the terminology of “desistance”.

            Various scholars also criticised the emphasis on high and moderate quality evidence, saying that paediatric care often relies on low quality evidence in other areas; that in downgrading qualitative research, the patient voice was minimised; and that the highest quality evidence (such as from randomised controlled trials) may be difficult or unethical to obtain in this area.

            Forcing trans kids to undergo the wrong puberty under the demands double-blind trials is as wrong as forcing a cis child to undergo the wrong puberty for the same purpose (like David Reimer was forced to), it’s an unreasonable expectation given the clinical context of the treatment being so low risk and the outcomes being so positive.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I want the strongest possible set of information for this and any other question so we can make informed decisions. Right now there are more questions than answers.

          It’s just like intelligent design and the “god of the gaps” arguments, where the space God/gods could have done their work slowly shrinks as our understanding of the world around us improves. I have no clue if we’ll ever close all the gaps, but every time intelligent design takes a hit, more people jump ship.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Imagine thinking that one Clarence Thomas is less corrupt than thousands of doctors.

    • evilcultist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Coming from Vance, I like how the logic underlying the statements presumes a profit motive undermines the result.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Stay classy, MAGA. You don’t give two shits about your country, you actually did steal an election, and the backwash is coming.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    "a screenshot from clearsky showing jd vance's account as the most blocked in 24 hours on bluesky"

    it’s going well.

    also lol’ing at the fact that he’s jd-vance-1 because jd-vance was taken by a parody account which has a big banner reading “I did not fuck a couch”.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly. Why would they give patients long out of patent meds that aren’t even habit forming for this? Nah, if you want to make money with medicine you gotta go the Sackler route. Every trans person I know’s HRT brand of choice is “generic please”

      • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not only that, but targeting the ~20% of the population that’s post-menopausal cis women with all the benefits of HRT would be a WAY bigger market than the 1-5% of the population that might be trans. If it was about making money on HRT, they’re certainly not going for a very large market.

        Not only that, but wouldn’t Big Pharma™ be lobbying heavily against all the anti-trans healthcare bills? Seems like they’re doing a pretty awful job of maintaining their market.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    4 days ago

    Pretty sure he did that on purpose so he can tell the public how awful and disgusting he thinks Bluesky is in the future.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nah. This seems a transparent attempt to gather political good will. The Nazis have whipped our ass with their social-media ground game. This is simply another tentacle.

      • hr_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Por que no los dos? There’s no downside for him, either he can spread his hate there and win or he gets banned and screams and whines and wins

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        They used to avoid the Mainstream Media, preferring their own bought and paid for Conservative Propaganda Machine, but that changed during HiterPig’s first term.

        Suddenly, news outlets were excited to have MAGA Nazis come on their shows to spew lies and propaganda, with no challenge. They allowed the Traitors to use their airwaves to abuse the relationship that news orgs had built with their viewers. Viewers, trusting that relationship, often believed the lies, and gave MAGA undeserved credibility.

        If they were going to let those jackals in their airwaves, the news media had the responsibility to use that opportunity to challenge the lies, and expose the MAGA Nazis for the traitors they are, but the media did nothing.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I think it’s another step after the recent push of how “BlueSky is dying” because they actively reject assholes, that was going on last week.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Make a new account, immediately start spewing unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, get banned

    I gotta say, I am liking blue sky so far

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    The biggest delusion in modern society is thinking that a Twitter-like social media network is “the place to go for common sense political discussion and analysis”.

    I keep hearing the media repeat this bullshit. Twitter is not and never was the “public square”. It’s a place for morons to be morons and heart each other for being morons.

    • Transtronaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Makes me wonder if the actual public squares, sans idealization, were also a place for morons to be morons and heart each other for being morons.

  • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    Apparently, they reinstated it saying they just wanted to confirm it was really him before fully activating it.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I still can’t believe that a deranged asshole like him is legally allowed to be VP of a nuclear power

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    BIG PHARMA MAKIN THE KIDS CUT THEY DICKS OFF

    god republicans are stupid. So fucking stupid.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      Remember, the likes of Vance aren’t stupid, they know the shit they say isn’t real but it riles their base up and creates enough anger that their base will ignore all the shit the republicans get up to.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        More than that, it causes a knee jerk reaction from many liberals as well, and they end up defending a practice that is relevant to about 1% of voters, and isn’t that important to a very significant number of voters. So Ds waste a LOT of time defending a subject that isn’t very important to most people, instead of the issues they should be focused on, which will attract voters, like Medicare 4 All, or Student Loan Reform, etc.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, Big Pharma is happy to fuck me in lots of ways, but the $20/month (without insurance even!) on my T shots ain’t it.

    • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I always hated when I went to the school nurse for a bruised knee and got estrogen instead of having the bruise disinfected

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        My parents got really mad the day I came home as a girl. They were pissed! Made me go back to school the next day and get my penis re-installed.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Do you think JD understands the irony that posting an exerpt from Justice Thomas that is against appealing to the authority of “experts”, is, in itself, in fact appealing to the authority of an “expert”, Justice Thomas, to support his stance? His stance of course being that medical treatment of minors with gender dysphoria in a way that does anything but reinforce the gender on their birth certificate is bad medicine/science. And both Vance and Justice Thomas also, being… I see here “not experts in anything remotely to do with medical science, gender dysphoria, adolescent development, or any field at all that would inform any semblance of a valid opinion on the matter of how to properly treat these kids medically” might, in fact, make their stance a little bit non-authoritative. Maybe both of them should stay in their lanes of bad faith partisan political theatre, bribery, and forcing the sprint we are all on towards fascism. That seems to be where their real skill sets are.

    • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      it’s not even factually accurate since the majority of medical organizations agree there’s no harm in transitioning.

      • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        But what about the harm done to some other random dude who might find “a man in a dress” attractive and now questions his sexuality which is against God’s will?

        /s

        • Reygle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          What about when a uh… random dude… finds a trans person attractive and likes what it does to his concept of self and sees it being “against god’s will” a bonus

          asking for a friend

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Those are the ones they are putting air quotes around as “experts” because they disagree with them, and therefore must be crackpots.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Vance isn’t talking to us. He’s talking to his supporters.

      In their world, scientists are icky, and therefore can’t be trusted by red-blooded conservatives. Clarence Thomas, however, is GOP Approved.

    • zout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Vance is somewhat of an expert on gender and sexuality though, being the cough fucker he is…