cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agoNew Mathlemmy.mlimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1833arrow-down112cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1821arrow-down1imageNew Mathlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square117fedilinkcross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
minus-squareembed_me@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoYes, that requires a reference value to be decided upon beforehand.
minus-squaredriving_croonerlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoNot really, you do t=n and t=n+1, for n= 1, 2, 3 for a quick view on volatility. Then ypu look up for correlations between e[t=n | t= 0, t= 1…] for different Ns. For more I would need to check out my notes
minus-squareembed_me@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoOh I was imagining something entirely different. Like a simple logarithmic scale of a signal, I do not know anything about time series analysis. Should’ve kept my mouth shut
Yes, that requires a reference value to be decided upon beforehand.
Not really, you do t=n and t=n+1, for n= 1, 2, 3 for a quick view on volatility.
Then ypu look up for correlations between e[t=n | t= 0, t= 1…] for different Ns. For more I would need to check out my notes
Oh I was imagining something entirely different. Like a simple logarithmic scale of a signal, I do not know anything about time series analysis. Should’ve kept my mouth shut