• jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    1 day ago

    JFC is their moto seriously “The people voted for major reform”? First, they barely won and are acting like there was some monumental landslide victory.

    Second, none of what they’re doing is actually what they campaigned on. Trump actually tried to distance himself as much as possible from Project 2025 during the campaign.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        Isn’t it crazy that basically every election at this point is basically like:

        • Option 1) We keep the status quo, nothing really changes.
        • Option 2) We burn it all down to the ground. Not to rebuild something better, but just for the hell of it.
    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It doesn’t help that the Dems are continuing to act like it was a major victory, and that they are so weak and powerless to do anything.

      • Chakravanti@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Don’t be ignorant. Dems were on the same side. She quit so fast after the election counters were cracked that it was obvious she was already bought the fuck out.

        • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          You know it’s honestly more believable that she was bought than that the dems just accidentally ran a campaign that was so heinously out of touch.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 hours ago

      He campaigned for “I will fix everything on day one” and gave zero details, so if you voted for that I have a bridge to sell you. It was obvious, painfully obvious, that project 2025 was their program and since it had more that 3 pages and no pictures, trump didn’t understand it.

      Trump was caught on thousands of lies already, from crowd sizes, to cat eating, to covid curing, to sexual assault, to taxes, to hurricane paths, to state secrets, to election results. People knew VERY WELL what they were getting with him. This is no surprise. They voted exactly for this.

      About the result, I’m going to have to quote fast an furious here, doesn’t matter if by an inch or a mile…

      Besides, polls indicate that he is at his highest EVER approval rating. Not only people voted for this, they are actually enjoying this. Yes, you and me see where this is going, but the average voter still thinks that this is fine. Americans are dumb as fuck and (at least in Europe) the relationship has been damaged for generations. I was super supportive the first Trump admin and I thought the people learned their lesson, but apparently it just took the billionaires fucking up egg prices for people to shoot themselves in the floor with a cannon.

      There will be lots of pikachu faces just before leopards eat them and at this point I can’t help but shrug. I don’t think “I told you so” helps, but it’s all i have.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fascists lie about everything. If a fascist ever tells the truth, it’s either a mistake or a coincidence that conveniently aligns with their propaganda and goals.

      That’s just how fascism is, and always will be.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They should have voted to prevent this, but only half of them did. They other half lived through the first Trump admin and decided that it was not worth a few minutes of their time to prevent it. They didn’t have to cross an ocean or fight a war… they needed to visit a website to get registered and the mail a form (or stand in line for a while) to vote, and they didn’t.

        In other words, only 1/3 of Americans voted against this.

        • Chakravanti@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Musk cracked the counters. Trump candidly admited to exactly that about 53m into one of his “inauguration” speels.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        A large part of voting age Americans didn’t care enough either way.

            • Comment105@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              This is “angry people can become malicious no matter what they believe in”-theory.

              • Chakravanti@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                You suckers are fighting over what didn’t happen. That was a cracked election counter. Listen to the inuguration at 53m. Candidly admits. This is theft amd nothing less. Everything is just a story of bullshit story by the CIA that in the same way it flings everywhere is it tries to flip their elections to purchased pigs.

      • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Voter turnout was 64% which means 36% of Americans didn’t give enough of a shit to vote. Combine that with those who did vote for Trump and yeah, more than 2/3rds of Americans may as well have voted for it

        Edit: the distinction may not matter to you but it does to the countries your country is fucking over

  • spizzat2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    1 day ago

    This isn’t so much “hacked” as someone walked through the door they left wide open. They just hid it behind a bush.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Anyone who leaves a message in full view to announce they’ve accessed the system isn’t the real danger. If whoever this is could get in, so can the real experts from China, Russia, North Korea, etc. There’s no way Musk’s DOGE people, in their destructive haste, have taken any care over security. It’s even likely his team of punchable kids put in their own backdoors, thinking they were being clever. If and when foreign adversaries find their way in through those, they’re not putting up an announcement.

    • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah

      If it were me as a hacker and I wanted to cause real damage:

      “The US Federal Reserve is now deleted, US currency to be backed by bitcoin”

      Or

      “We have found evidence Fort Knox contains no gold. Biggest fraud in history”

      Or

      “US military contracts cancelled due to extreme overpayment”

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You seem to think that Trump didn’t add access keys for his idols the instant he got back in the door. He loves Putin and Kim Jun Il. They are like, his favorite drinking buddies.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sorry for the wall of text.

      You would hope that a public front end is entirely isolated from critical systems.

      Hackers got in.
      Either they saw there was nothing of value, and figured they would embarrass the owners.
      They got in, saw shitloads of value, but decided the ethical thing was to embarrass as opposed to exfil/exploit/sell the access.
      Or the hackers were explicitly aiming to embarrass the owners, and didn’t explore scope beyond that.
      It’s likely “gay furry hackers” or similar, and it’s “grey hat” hacking.

      The ethical route, ie “white hat”, is to contact the owners about the exploit with a fixed period disclosure. Ie, “fix this in 30-90 days, or we will publish our method”.
      “Gray hat” are more like this. Where they find an exploit, it could go deeper, but they do some lulz instead. Basically make it obvious something has been hacked, but not actually exploit it further.
      “Black hat” would find the exploit (even if it was limited access) then sell it while trying to leave no trace, so it can be exploited again. Or straight up exploit it themselves.

      There is a possibility of foreign agents doing false-flag gray hat shit. Exfil sensitive data, cover their tracks, then “botch” some “hahaha you’ve been pwnd” stuff. Both getting sensitive data, and derailing the US government (because Musk has been authorised by Trump. It’s a huge undermining).

      With the timeline, this seems like gray hat, or black hat further exploited by gray hat. Or false flag.

      The obvious aim is to embarrass the owners.
      This casts serious political shade on the DOGE servers that have been hooked into government networks without oversight. Any further data exfil is a bonus to certain foreign countries.

      Best case scenario is that this is domestic gray hat, the muSSk team learn from it, and figure out how actual internet security works, and harden their systems accordingly.
      I mean, the actual best case is that this DOGE coup gets stopped. But the president has authorised DOGE, so this is what America wants. So, not a coup.

      Ideally, this hack has 0 actual scope of security vulnerability.
      Other than the “yeh, but if they can get into your public web server (something expected to be hardened as fuck, and might as well be static file hosting. Seriously, why is there a database for this shit), how can we trust your servers on government networks”.
      But chances are the exploits to get into this server will be similar to the exploits to get into the government connected DOGE systems. Unless the sysadmin & network admins (god bless them) have managed to maintain some control that muSSk doesn’t understand, and are able to mitigate the tsunami of access such a compromised server might unleash.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        the muSSk team learn from it, and figure out how actual internet security works, and harden their systems accordingly.

        They won’t. Musk is a narcissist who thinks his every instruction is perfection, and his merry gang of racist goons are wet-behind-the-ears grads who have yet to be humbled by experience.

        My predicted outcome is they fix this hole, send the FBI after the grey-hats to make an example out of them, and continue on business as usual while a foreign nation laughs from the shadows with a rootkit installed. DOGE is a treasure trove of data, and network security is a cat and mouse game that takes real manpower and time to set up, maintain, and actively monitor. I don’t think these chucklefucks know anything about being a high-value target of state actors, and they’re too prideful to admit it and get help.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yeh, the difference between being high value (twitter) and an actual high value (government) target are entirely different. I bet many countries were salivating over the mere idea of these servers.

          I guess they will pass some laws about “hacking being illegal”, arrest some poor self-hosters that did nothing wrong, declare a victory, and change absolutely nothing - other than ruining people’s lives.

          I remember an article about a batch of compromised NICs from China that had backdoor firmware in them. You can harden your software system all you want, but when the literal hardware is backdoored, you are doomed.
          I think it was Supermicro. So am American company and not a small Mfr.
          I wonder if DOGE have reputable hardware, or if they cheapest out on servers.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Yeh, the difference between being high value (twitter) and an actual high value (government) target are entirely different.

            Exactly. Tesla or Twitter might be on a country’s radar for juicy IP theft reasons, but that’s a speck of dust in comparison to a network full of classified government secrets. A country doesn’t burn multiple zero-days and backdoor supply chains to find out the contents of the next Tesla firmware update. They sure as hell do when it gives them access to military information and civil infrastructure of a world power.

            I wonder if DOGE have reputable hardware, or if they cheapest out on servers.

            I doubt it. If the way Elon talks about software is indicative of his understanding of hardware or cybersecurity, he has absolutely no idea what the fuck he’s actually doing. Knowing that, it’s probably an off the shelf commercial rack-mount with IME enabled and the management port plugged into the same switch as the regular network interface.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The ethical route, ie “white hat”, is to contact the owners about the exploit with a fixed period disclosure. Ie, “fix this in 30-90 days, or we will publish our method”.

        I’m not sure that is the ethical route when you’re talking about disrupting the operations of a Nazi-led government.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Hmm, maybe I mean moral?
          Like, there is a correct way to go about something regardless of context.
          As opposed to doing something because of the context.

          Any exploit should be notified to the software/platform maintainers with a proper disclosure timeline to ensure it gets fixed in a timely way.
          That is the correct way.

          Abusing the shit out of a poorly implemented nazi government is the moral thing to do, but would go against a white hat’s ethics. Collectively a good thing to do, but not the correct thing to do as a white hat.

          Are gray hats more ethically and morally true?
          This is getting to deep for me.

        • Zoop@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I dont recall having heard of this term yet; although of course I’ve heard of what it refers to happening. Thank you for sharing this here!

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yeh, but they aren’t keeping control.
          They have been elected. They have 4 years.
          So far, it doesn’t seem that they have broken any laws or whatever, that would cause the system to reject their workings. They’ve rigged the courts, so the system is unlikely to reject their workings.
          I’d say it’s more of a constitutional coup. They are using loop holes to seize more power.
          I think it will be an attempted self-coup in 4 years.

          Regardless, it isn’t worth arguing about.
          It’s wrong. It’s a shit sandwich, the flavour of shit doesn’t matter.