• TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    As a SoCal city dweller, large scale fires were mostly a non issue as long as you live in urban areas. The response is always quick enough to prevent entire neighborhoods from getting rolled over, as the system is designed to handle surges by sharing resources. However, much like with hospitals dealing with outbreaks, there is usually an upper limit to how much they can do.

    There has never been anything like this in modern history because this fire was a consequence of climate change. Excessive dryness and powerful winds created the wildfire equivalent of a flash flood, leaving firefighters little time to react. They were already fighting a war on the coast, but the storm created a blitzkrieg that descended onto densely populated areas before they could properly redeploy.

    This is just speculation, but I suspect that death toll isn’t in the hundreds or thousands because they prioritized evacuation over saving property. The areas hit were more urban than I ever thought possible, and it really could’ve been far worse given how quickly everything happened. The budget cuts didn’t help, but this event was so extreme that I doubt a bigger budget could’ve saved many homes. In this case, the wrath of nature against ALL of humanity is most responsible,

    • BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earthOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes, and I live in LA. I’m a handful of blocks away from the evac warning perimeter. The message is not that budget cuts caused the fire. We who have lived here have seen the fires get worse every year because of climate change. The message is that our mayor’s tough-on-crime politics are to the detriment of public safety and our actual, material needs as Angelenos.

    • driving_crooner
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There has never been anything like this in modern history

      This shit is happening every year now.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      …because this fire was a consequence of climate change.

      You mean that thing that’s happening, that we haven’t been able to stop, caused this fire to be worse? Who could have predicted this?? (/s)

      I live in the state of Victoria, Australia and we have, in fact, predicted this. We have a statewide fire service, we don’t cut their funding, and we have strict building codes in fire-prone areas, as well as stricter overall no matter where in the state you build.

      We’ve studied the impacts of climate change, and prepare for the worst.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You can’t say them werds here in 'Merica. You’ll scare the executive’s profits!

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You make an excellent point that the SoCal fires will have high property value damage but low life loss because people were prioritized over property.

  • Y5QcY2Cu9@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They did not defund the fire department. They still shoukd defund the cops, but don’t make shit up to argue for it.

    • freethemedia@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Increasing police funding consistently while not doing the same at the same rate for fire health and emergency services is in fact defunding the fire department.

      When cop salaries and equipment are always priority #1, the police are in fact defunding US