2·
2 months agohe’s no brian leiter.
epigone
priorities, but you know how OnlyFans creators be posting to own the discourses https://archive.ph/337Kw #nowplaying https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdGbXISimlk
- 0 Posts
- 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: August 7th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·2 months agoone cat’s nip is another cat’s jazz
31·2 months ago- metacognitive myopia explained why people didn’t/couldn’t update their beliefs about the existence of “weapons of mass destruction etc”.
- dogwhistling the threat of sexual revolution “comrade kamala” (i.e., he’s implying hypocrisy when he doesn’t understand what lenin’s use of the term “prostitute” meant).
- playing the fool until you can’t (i.e., making his base feel insightful and “seen” as playfully serious, homophilically/mimetically charismatic; e.g., his base feels like their inference-making is being promoted based on linguistic sympathy through the aura of charisma).
- from (3) somewhere in his administration they’re letting the would-be “fool” base do the grunt-work and creating cover; see “Optimal Team Formation Under Asymmetric Information”.
elizabeth warren lampoons trump and vance
seems more important that people wanted him to, even if he didn’t, as what a settlement might imply.
is the threat better than the existence of the threat? does threatening mean being constantly present?
have books become too heavy for men?
2·4 months agoRemoved by mod
Removed by mod
doctrine of double effect hours
4·4 months agosince 2008 (the artilect wars) or the third “a.i.” winter?
the gettier problem
1·4 months agommo festive “sexual” cartesian theatres coming for disney world from japan with loving kindness
South Park’s comedic antics will be lost on droves of beautiful souls unless The Critic is rebooted.
algorithms of oppression. noble.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
since you know by 2020 that modeling categorical logic and categorical truth tables tell you less about the “trumper” than the non-trumper do you [really] want to risk it, framing the trumper, at least, as a “moron” who can’t muster the “IQ” points (btw, was everybody jumping on that that new EQ+AQ+SQ wagon to own the Young-Girl’s war on war)?
that paradoxical circumstance where trump acts the fool, because he knows you’ll take the bait, in front of his base, amplified by algorithmic blunders: socialism and barbarism/annihilation, have always lived side-by-side. your mythology of technology only cyclically prevents you from seeing that.