Capcom has been putting out hit after hit for a decade and one “failed” game, that still sold 10 million copies, does that much damage.

The AAA market is ridiculous.

Also also also: Capybaras

That looks fantasstic

Hands the Joker unscathed to the police only for him to escape 10 minutes later

The 2D Castlevania games still hold up well, except the NES ones for being NES hard. Most of them are available for purchase through collections.

Did you mean to write “defund”?

I think he meant the environment will be so polluted and radioactive that cancer will be more common at younger ages

Found Rainbolt’s Lemmy account

And this is why science shouldn’t be beheld to the whims of politicians and capitalists

I still have it installed and I plan to keep it until my smartphone stops working

I work for a start up that got sold to a big bank and the experience has been exactly the same.

If the job market wasn’t so terrible right now, I’d have left already.

I had the same experience.

Up to room 46, it felt like every failed run built up to your eventual success, like any good roguelite. You failed, but at least gained a bit of knowledge, a permanent upgrade or improvement to the state.

Then you get to a point where each run is less and less rewarding and eventually give up. There’s nothing left to learn or upgrade, it’s now a fight with the RNG.

Turns out the ancient Egyptians were right all along!

In the latest game she triggers a massive flood that destroys an entire village, possibly killing hundreds of people, IN THE TUTORIAL STAGE!

Pretty sure he and many actors do this to mess with paparazzi

I had a boss who thought I was slacking off when I opened the “incomprehensible black screen with random letters and numbers”.

My headcanon is that when a character “dies” in battle, it actually means they are in critical condition, requiring more powerful healing magic or items to get them back on their feet.

Of course, there are some exceptions. In Phantasy Star 2 and Cyber Knight the characters die for real and are replaced with clones.

My theory is that C-suites are actually using “AI efficiency gain” as an excuse for laying off workers without scaring the shareholders.

“I didn’t lay off 10% of the workforce because the company is failing. It’s because… uhmmmm… AI! I have replaced them with AI! Please give us more money.”

I don’t want to start

Any blasphemous rumours

But I think that God

Got a sick sense of humour

And when I die

I expect to find him laughing

Whenever a chatbot is added to a product I use, the first and only thing I ask is how to disable it