So the problem with Marxism is that labor isn’t considered something that individuals own themselves. Either in socialism it’s owned by the state, or in communism it’s owned by “the people”

The M-C-M’ cycle is just kind of… how things work? There is labor involved in changing currency for commodities, and exchanging the commodity for more money than originally bought for. Like doing maintenance on the commodity, maybe transportation, etc. The only way you can purchase a commodity and then proceed to sell it for a profit is if some labor had occurred to make that commodity more valuable. Therefore the extra money comes from that labor. You can’t buy a TV from Walmart for $400 and try to sell it for $500 right out the front door, but someone might pay a premium for you to deliver it to their house.

Point being that’s the fundamental flaw with saying “M-C-M’ bad” because it doesn’t account for labor, much like most marxist theories.

Removed by mod

Eh point still stands, I wouldn’t use an edit of bike cuck to make a point unless the point was to satirize his original point.

Well some things might change but I’m just saying people overestimate how much will change.

I don’t feel like verifying that all of them happened directly but I can say at the very minimum the last dot isn’t something he did. Because… you know. Reality.

Oh no. You people definitely hate me. That has been made very clear over the years. Oh sure, people would change their tune if I renounced my religion and joined your cult, but thats how all cults work. No thank you.

Removed by mod

He’s doing at least half of those things. Depending on how you view things.

This is what I ordered. Not how you famed it but the exact thing I wanted I am getting here. So… not too worried.

This is how Marxists think. Marxists are not very intelligent.

Tune it out. Nothing ever changes by a change in political leaders alone. People are just going crazy because the terminally online lost the election.

In like what parts of the world tho?

Also technically humans invented the idea of an invasive species. Otherwise it’d just be nature taking its course.

First pass the post suuuuucks. Literally anything else is at least slightly better.

Yeah. I voted third party in 2020, which effectively did nothing.

I did not make the same mistake twice, good did something this time.

Wouldnt each side accuse the other of that specifically whilst believing their own side doesn’t?

I’m guessing that’s the point of the question.

Also known as Bike Cuck

I’m gonna be honest this is a dumb way to view these issues. “You’re either with me or against me” just fuels an “us vs them” mentality that leads to hate and division more than anything. It shows that you’d rather label people as “the enemy” than try to understand other perspectives. Also this is the bike cuck guy. Just saying.

I mean I imagine if someone went to a liberal/satanist establishment and asked for a cake celebrating the overturn of roe v wade they would refuse. And rightfully so.

Ok but how are plants not being exploited? Also it could be said that you can get meat without exploiting animals, such as getting rid of invasive species. At a certain point it’s not a diet it’s an ideology, and I feel they should have separate names. Because let’s say you’re just against exploitation of living organisms, then you’d be fine with eating invasive species, or meat hunted yourself, but deny eating anything from a farm.

I’d say when it comes to veganism it’s basically up to what you personally want to eat. I personally have no moral quandary with eating animals but if you do, I wouldn’t call you a hypocrite for eating jellyfish. Plants feel pain too, in a similar way, I could see it being justified. Taxonomy shouldn’t decide your morality.