The main thing we’d lose is the autonomy to manage our own economy. Given that’s something we’ve handled especially well resulting in impressive economic stability in spite of global events, it’s not a thing to be sacrificed lightly - or at all.

The main benefit of joining the Eurozone is tight economic integration that lets member nations share the larger group’s economic stability. That benefit is never going to substantively materialize for a nation physically separated by an ocean. But we’d still be losing the right to decide how many power coupons we print, directly regulate our own banks, and set interest rates/inflation targets.

I’m open to other forms of EU association, but the Eurozone is a solid hell no.

Any reporter who’s inclined to ask tough questions and actually given a chance has about three hundred others that hit closer to home for their own electorate. They’ll be lucky if they can ask two, and know they’re not getting an actual answer anyway.

It’s just another example of Canada letting the U.S. dictate our IP laws to their media moguls’ benefit, for the sake of trade. These are the things Dumpster does not count in the balance of a deal yet presumes is entrenched even after reneging on that deal.

If the deal is ripped up, it should be ripped up entirely.

We’re being gifted more freedom to make sure our own laws are working for us.

I’ll take homelessness over being conquered, thank you just the same.

Man, he’s really hitting the ground running, and every step is fire. A couple weeks ago I was begging for Canada’s leadership to shut down U.S. negotiations until Dumpster acknowledged our sovereignty and repudiated his threats against it. And Trudeau was handling things pretty well, but no way he’d go that far.

Carney did it in on day 2. ✊

I think we might have found the only leader in the Western world that can outpace the orange clown.

Addendum: I first broached that “demand acknowledgement” move over a month ago.

I sympathize with Newfoundlanders, but running more efficient operations at scale is how we increase our national productivity. I think the answer is to figure out how to make that work both ways and also to repurpose the labor that’s made redundant.

I’d wager Newfoundland will remain the primary market for their own unique alcohol products, and won’t they additionally be able to grow their interprovincial sales? That won’t cover all the losses, but Canada also needs a lot of stuff that Canada does not produce and no longer wants to buy from the U.S. That represents opportunity.

Maybe, but we can’t be sure until they call their rivals sodomists.

If you nip it in the bud, no one has to do any butt stuff. 😉

We’re about one year into a constant deluge of off-season CPC-sponsored attack ads everywhere.

Well, apparently.

I need to go give the team behind uBlock Origin a hug, or a beer.

I took a pass on that when it released. Horror, and especially psychological horror, are really not my jam. The closest I ever got to enjoying something like that is Resident Evil. That’s why The Fly isn’t on my list either. But that reminds me of another Canadian movie that caught my interest after watching a video essay about it: Blood Quantum (2019).

You bring the jet fuel; I’ve got a ton of PLA+ in stock already. What could go wrong?

I half expected “best” to be an extraneous word, as in there only are 51 Canadian films. Lucky for me, I like to to fact check before letting my mouth leak. As it turns out, we recently produced three times that within the span of one year, and the National Film Board of Canada takes credit for over 13,000 films since 1939.

That does come with a caveat, however, in that the NFB runs on subsidy to the tune of ~$70m per year and isn’t really focused on mainstream, commercially successful entertainment. The numbers likely include “films” as short as 5 minutes, along with everything between that and feature length movies.

What’s my point? I, uh, didn’t get that far. Hopefully I’ve at least managed to pivot from parading my ignorance to acknowledging it.

Anyway, a few of the featured pique my curiosity (which I’m listing here for my own future reference):

• BlackBerry (2023, was already planning on watching at some point)
• Goon (2004)
• Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media (1992)
• Seeds (2024)
• Strange Brew (1983, hoping it’s more “Dumb and Dumber” and less “Dude, Where’s My Car?”)
• Movies that aren’t really Canadian:
  • Navalny (2022)
  • Turning Red (2022)

Well now it feels like I’m parading my lack of culture. 🤷‍♂️

It’s not too late for us all to do better. 😉

Given that so much of warfare is logistics, I’d think having a plane that costs half as much to buy and one third as much per hour of flight factors pretty heavily - including on that cost of training pilots. And I cannot imagine U.S. maintenance supply would come close to cost competitiveness vs having domestic manufacturing support that also spends defense money into our own economy.

Sure that probably wouldn’t have tipped the balance a couple years ago - I mean, it didn’t.

But here we are. At least we aren’t already 40 planes into production.

Wab Kinew is First Nations, right? Not getting it does you credit. But people are going to expect it to mean something. It’s probably best to clear the reeds by aiming for an intentional one.

People don’t have to believe the misinformation they repeat, as long as they believe it justifies some action that will benefit them. For example, the more depleted the Colorado river basin gets, the more British Columbia will turn out to be full of terrorists and cartels, or its leaders plotting to disrupt the Frasier River, or whatever else… It’s not like the details matter.

What matters is that the people in the place with the thing you want are evil now.

I don’t rule out hostilities directed at Canadians on lemmy being something directly fomented by bots or including bot participation. But that’s a rather low-value influence operation. I’d wager at least some is just a side effect of the vector that concerns me more: the faithful spreading a gospel aimed at Americans to manufacture American consent for something.

Likewise thanks. And you do raise a good point with this:

whatever you choose, do it carefully with full knowledge that what your country looks like on the other side of the decision matters greatly to you and the world.

I do think that’s something too few Canadians are considering. With all the patriotic rage brewing, there are a lot of calls for our various levels of leadership to lash out in any direction they can. People are getting mad at them for instead mostly sticking to a wiser path, focused on pressure rather than catharsis. You’ll see our politicians in public speeches constantly reiterating how Canada and the U.S. are and should still be friends working to mutual benefit. I don’t think anyone believes that, nor that we’d ever accept a return to status quo. That messaging is for the international community and American public, making clear that we are not the aggressors and will not rise to become such.

I see paths where the U.S. administration provokes an overreaction which weakens our footing on the high ground and creates a window for actions of a less purely economic nature. I’ve always expected the U.S. to eventually come after our resources wielding guns, not dollars, but this is way ahead of schedule even with the pressures of climate change. Dumpster is skipping long crucial steps propagandizing away the friendship to manufacture consent for war. That isn’t going to work, but our actions here and now could jump-start that process of branding us hostiles.

As it stands, the trade war is a blessing for Canada’s long-term outlook. It is validating the painful pace at which we’ve been recently growing our population, steeling our resolve to weather more pain for a nationally shared goal, and giving us the unity needed to dodge our own rightward descent, decouple from the U.S., diversify supply lines for critical assets (especially of military tech), and ultimately demonstrate that we are not a soft target even for the U.S. I only hope he stays the course and we hold our red lines. No deal is the best deal anyway.

And - assuming the CIA is really gutted and not being converted into a shadow organization - I like Canada’s odds. At some point you might start thinking of your family in Canada as your in with a nation that still has a bright long-term economic outlook. 😉

The point isn’t to win back the disingenuous nor the fools they’ve captured, but rather to head neutral people off at the high-traffic gateways to alt-right pipelines. The first thing cultists will try to do is isolate people from legitimate support systems, and in this case that means discrediting institutions by attributing malice to every action.

But they’re going to say something bad no matter what is or isn’t done, and aren’t bound by the truth anyway. So I say play the numbers game and focus on the undecided, not the cultists. We won’t know what impact it has until we try and then measure the results (like metrics on DNS lookups, from which we can probably estimate drops in Canadian traffic to those sites vs drops in Canadian traffic overall which would signify people switching to other DNS servers).

Censorship is a risky tool to be sure, but realistically the authoritarian risks are pretty far removed from Canada’s political center, and we already do it for various reasons that the general public widely accepts. As long as we’re staying within a good legal framework, to me it’s only a question of results and specifically the result of keeping fascist movements marginalized and its members surrounded by rational people who were given the benefit of forewarning.

The type of people who understand and will use (collaboratively or otherwise) the tools available to proactively filter what information reaches them are going to generally fall into two categories:

• people who are not particularly susceptible to misinformation
• people already captured by misinformation (who will use such tools to help avoid cognitive dissonance, usually with block lists curated by their thought leaders)

I think the misinformation problem is, at it’s root, a shortage of trust in institutions (fueled partly by actual failures, but more by deliberate attacks). As such, there is no systemic solution that people who most need it won’t go to great lengths to circumvent. But combatting misinformation is a numbers game, and the largest number of vulnerable citizens are low-information voters who are not particularly radicalized but simply react to whatever reaches them with far too little skepticism.

For them, I think some simple, low level and easily circumvented internet filtering would do a world of good. Like just have our ISPs serve up DNS redirects to government-hosted pages proclaiming the site is blocked and detailing why, with links to things like private, non-partisan analysis as supporting evidence. Circumventing this is trivial, but the initial hurdle is good enough to redirect a sizeable amount of low-information, unmotivated users somewhere more productive or at least better moderated. It’s also weak enough to minimize the inevitable complaints about censorship.

I don’t like censorship myself, but I’m past believing we can maintain national security with none at all. People who are reasonably well-informed are finding their collective future just as threatened as the low-information voters inviting foreign influence through the back door.