I can’t think of any. The current oil reserve is supposed to be used in the case of another oil embargo. But its actual use is to lower gas prices when the administration in power needs a political win.

I actually think the purpose of a Bitcoin reserve is to temporarily increase the price so tech-bros (re: Elon) can sell at a massive profit. Then buy back at a much lower price. It’s just a way to indirectly transfer federal dollars into administration pockets.

I can’t find any reason for the government to buy crypto and hold it in reserve.

  • jrs100000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The only real benefit I can see would be to have the ability to suddenly crash the market on demand. This might be an interesting way to temporarily disrupt states trying to evade sanctions with crypto, but probably not a great investment on the $ to impact scale.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    “I actually think the purpose of a Bitcoin reserve is to temporarily increase the price so tech-bros (re: Elon) can sell at a massive profit. Then buy back at a much lower price. It’s just a way to indirectly transfer federal dollars into administration pockets.”

    This is the way. It’s the only reason they’d do it.

    I seriously doubt BRICS has anything to do with Bitcoin, but the US is absolutely concerned about losing the status of world currency. It’s literally how we survive while running a massive deficit. When the rest of the world finds a way to do business without the US getting its cut we’re going to be in deep shit.

    • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That’s exactly what the plan is. They’re funneling themselves government money, but in a way that’s less traceable

      • knightly [none/use any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s not “less traceable”, bitcoin is a public ledger, literally every transaction is documented on the blockchain for anyone and the IRS to see.

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          … Less traceable in that the price of the coin going up and them cashing out isn’t a direct line from the government coffers to their pocket.

          I’m aware it’s a public ledger.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Just the rumor of it alone benefits HODLers, and Trump has HODLers who donated to his election campaign.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It is the same reason why the USA still holds gold and silver even through they aren’t pegged to the dollar, it is an asset class which could be useful in the future.

    • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The issue is that relative to gold or silver, Bitcoin is very volatile. A crashing bitcoin could endanger the reserve, forcing the government to double down, making the volatile nature a bigger issue.

      Yes gold is somewhat volatile but compared to Bitcoin, it is super stable. And ofc gold and silver are real resources that you can do for their physical properties.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Price support can be a reason to create a reserve, but it isn’t the only reason. Most countries don’t plan their good and silver purchases based on trying to meet a value represented in currency.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        A lot of countries keep a reserve of Euros, which is a fiat currency not tied to a single country and only came into being about 25 years ago.

        Currency is like Tinkerbell, it only lives through belief in it. Right now, enough people believe in Bitcoin being a currency and that belief doesn’t seem to be going away as long as the Internet still exists.

  • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, Please tell me it’s not in Elon playbook ?

    US money is incredibly strong, so US$ is way more interesting.

    15 years after it’s creation the bitcoin failed to meet the expectation of being a usable money or even “way to pay”

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Considering that the US Mint can literally print money, I can’t think of any reason either. I guess it won’t affect inflation as much, but still mass selling it will increase the money supply available to the government.

  • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I would much rather we had a BTC reserve than we CONTINUED MAKING ACTUAL COINS.

    When I visited the Denver mint around 25 years ago our tour guide mentioned we lost about half a cent on every penny we make.

  • mayooooo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The worst part about this is the thick as shit stupid tony countries who will have their citizens robbed even worse by their own small thick shitty governments. This is the age of fucking stupidity