• zea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is basically the tolerance paradox but for violence. If people are willing to use violence on me (denying healthcare, keeping us poor, stochastic terrorism) then I’m fine using it back, otherwise they get free reign.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      But the violence will never end. By using violence back on them you change nothing. The solution is not violence, it is political action.

      If you have any actual impact on politics via violence then you’re justing going to tear down a bad system for an obviously worse outcome.

      • anti-idpol action@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Political action is violent by definition. To rule somebody essentially means nothing else than to enforce your will upon somebody by force.

        There can be no talk of consensual politics in a society where opinions are shaped by media owned and managed by the ruling tiny, very wealthy minority.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lmao taxing big businesses for operating in an economic region and using those funds to create railroads, libraries, hospitals iS ViOleNCe!

          • anti-idpol action@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Yes because if you don’t pay the taxes, armed men will come and put you in a prison where you’ll work for fucking dogshit, taxation is not chipping in some spare cash for a fundraiser like in some ancap wet dreams.

            Oh and they’ll make damn sure you do not cheat on your taxes either, because the tax authorities in most countries have the prerogatives comparable to those of intel agencies, which means encroaching upon your privacy.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              And they fucking should, because a billion dollar company shouldn’t get off scott free for taking and not giving the agreed upon amounts owed to the people. THAT is how laws work. People need to build a system to deal with these billionaires, to correct the system that created them, not a system that forces people to become savage animals and solves nothing.

              • anti-idpol action@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I finally feel like agreeing with you here. Yes we need to build such a system. But it won’t be built by complacency and idle talk while the billionaires rob us in broad daylight. It requires struggle. The law is only an ideal but it’s interpretation and execution depends on the material reality whether you like it or not and that was recognized even by people you wouldn’t call materialists and who made great contributions to the modern philosophy of the law, such as Hegel.

                Hegel also had this concept of Sittlichkeit, which is closely linked to the teleological interpretation of the law, namely that what matters is the intent and purpose of the laws and that the purpose of the law should be the greatest common good.

                But that is just a beautiful vision that is not realisitically attainable in a system controlled by a tiny minority which can afford better lawyers, bribe the lawmakers and even the justice system at times, essentially to rig the system to fit their needs.

                We do need a system that does not perpetuate violence against anyone. But that system is irreconcilable with class society where the antagonisms between the exploiters and the exploited will sooner or later lead to one eruption or another. Social peace is over. The question is how we secure a system truly fit for the needs of many against the attacks by the deposed few furious at the lost comforts attained at the expense of their fellow human beings with as little bloodshed as possible and establish a society where the antagonisms and stratification of yore are no longer relevant.

                But before the working class firmly secures it’s power, it will have every right to defend itself, even if it involves such counterattacks for the suffering caused by the other party. Sitting idly and flinching at the very thought of violence will end to the same tragedies as those that happened in Chile in 1973 and in countless other places.

                I dream a world where man
                No other man will scorn,
                Where love will bless the earth
                And peace its paths adorn
                I dream a world where all
                Will know sweet freedom’s way,
                Where greed no longer saps the soul
                Nor avarice blights our day.
                A world I dream where black or white,
                Whatever race you be,
                Will share the bounties of the earth
                And every man is free,
                Where wretchedness will hang its head
                And joy, like a pearl,
                Attends the needs of all mankind-
                Of such I dream, my world!

                But dreams are nothing without a clear and uncompromising strategy for making them a reality.

      • zea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The violence already doesn’t end. Why should I sit and take it? Obviously we need political stuff too, but violence is a useful tool to those ends.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          The “violence” of only the majority of people getting the healthcare they need is nothing compared to the “violence” of riots and murders in the streets.

          Nor would more violence in any way remedy the old violence.