she/they

  • 4 Posts
  • 382 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 31st, 2023

help-circle

  • This is an interesting look into your mind. Do you really think they’ll be the same? Trump will accelerate hit since he doesn’t even pretend to care, is that the same? He’ll also attack more minorities domestically, killing many more people, is that the same?

    I guess in a black and white worldview those are basically the same, but 'cmon, we can have some nuance here.


  • “This follows the French gambit archetype, a story that’s been in our culture for hundreds of generations, where women are depicted as subjects who assert their need for fortification from external threats… and that’s why women should be subservient to men.”

    Fake quote, but it does sound like the kind of thing he’d say. Unfortunately, he’s pretty bad at making his reasoning sound, and he likes to cite stories as if they imply anything about what anyone should do.






  • If we were living in the 1930s they’d be the same people complaining we’re being unfair to Hitler and we need to hear his perspective too.

    Hell, he used the same political strategy as modern day fascist politicians: simply lying. “I’m gonna make everything better! How? Don’t worry about that, just trust me and also let me reassert Germany’s national pride!” I’m reminded of Trump’s ACA “plan” (that he doesn’t have one).

    And we just let them say that, unchallenged! Maybe someone asks how they’ll do it, but viewers just hear a strong man telling a story of future prosperity and ignore any small details a journalist might counter with. In the name of “balance”, we let them spread their info hazards and pretend silly things like facts will let people come to the right conclusion.


  • I believe the old technique was gradient ascent starting with a random image and optimizing for the classifier’s dogginess score, but now we train image denoisers then give them pure noise and tell them it’s a noisy image of a dog. Basically, we lie to models to make them make stuff for us, and we’ve gotten better at what lying scheme we use.







  • I already knew that party sucked, and our options in the election sucked. I’ve seen them move farther right to appeal to the mythical moderate rather than actually become something anyone would like to vote for. That does not change anything I said in the last reply.

    My vote is not an endorsement, nor a signal that I trust them, it is merely one lever which I use tactically. Harris was the tactical vote.


  • I think you’re confusing “Vote Harris” with “Vote Harris and do nothing else”. Obviously voting for a slightly lesser genocider isn’t sufficient, but she seems more open to changing than Trump which is worth something.

    The Democratic party can occasionally be strong-armed into doing something less horrible, the Republican party would probably do the bad thing harder to spite you. I prefer the more malleable candidates for achieving my goals. That being said, there’s no use yelling at people for not voting Harris, because what’s done is done, and there’s no lesson yelling will teach.