• BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Because when it is to actually get paid work done, all the bloat adds up and that 3 days upfront could shave weeks/months of your yearly tasks. XKCD has a topic abut how much time you can spend on a problem before effort outweighs productivity gains. If the tasks are daily or hourly you can actually spend a lot of time automating for payback

    And note this is one instance of task, imagine a team of people all using your code to do the task, and you get a quicker ROI or you can multiply dev time by people

    • _pi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      SDLC can be made to be inefficient to maximize billable hours, but that doesn’t mean the software is inherently badly architected. It could just have a lot of unnecessary boilerplate that you could optimize out, but it’s so hard to get tech debt prioritized on the road map.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You can write perfectly well structured and maintainable code in Python and still be more productive than in other languages.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That also goes to show why to not waste 3 days to shave 2 seconds off a program that gets run once a week.