• ATQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do we feel better about one person deciding Trumps guilt or 12?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      The judge in this case is absolutely fed up with Trump’s bullshit. I think he might be in trouble. He might actually lose his NY properties.

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      With a jury of 12 people, you could still have 1 person decide Trump’s guilt. Say the trial ends and the jury goes to deliberate. 11 people say he’s guilty. 1 guy says Not Guilty and refuses to budge no matter what. That one holdout could decide whether or not Trump is found guilty - even if it’s because the holdout is a hardcore MAGA fan that got onto the jury.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Those jury selection hearings would’ve been entertaining though. With the attorneys trying to quickly sort out who is a maggot and who isn’t and squabbling over it.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would result in a hung jury and a mistrial.

        Which would likely result in retrial, not letting trump off the hook. (It is possible the judge lets it drop? But unlikely.)

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Problem is that retrials vastly favor the defendant, because now they have the prosecutors arguments as well as the evidence and it becomes easier to tailor the defense.