• crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Several of the victims were children.

    The fathers of these dead children will simply have to live with the terrible consequences of their involvement with antisemitic terror (who are we kidding, they don’t care.)

    They went off in crowds.

    In every such case only the agent was harmed. You’re proving how targeted the attack was.

    • Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The fathers of these dead children will simply have to live with the terrible consequences of their involvement with antisemitic terror

      So the children have to pay for their father’s crimes? This isn’t really a justification, and they don’t not care, now they have a real reason for retaliation—starting the cycle of hate all over again.

      • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So the children have to pay for their father’s crimes?

        No, they don’t have to. But they will when their fathers deliberately put them in danger.

        Again, he’ll just have to live with the tragic consequences (just kidding, we know he doesn’t care.)

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The kid’s blood is still on whoever triggered the devices hands. The child didn’t do anything.

      Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed? I can’t find anything making that claim.

      • irreticent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed?

        They keep citing a tweet while others keep refuting what they’re saying with articles from BBC, NPR, and other news outlets. There’s no point in arguing with someone that can’t provide reputable sources for their claims.

        *Edit: typo

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          First article I pulled up:

          https://www.npr.org/2024/09/20/g-s1-23812/lebanon-israel-exploding-pagers-hezbollah-international-law

          Many, but not all, of the pagers and walkie-talkies that unexpectedly blew up over two days across Lebanon and in some neighboring countries were in the possession of Hezbollah fighters, functionaries or allies. In this photo, an ambulance believed to be carrying wounded people drives down a street in a southern suburb of Beirut on September 18, 2024. The ambulance is white with a blue light on top that spans the width of the vehicle. Men stand on the sides of the street, which is lined with buildings. Middle East crisis — explained Another wave of blasts hits Lebanon, as Hezbollah reels from pager explosions

          The group is designated as a terrorist organization by several nations, including the United States, but many of its members and supporters operate in civilian areas across Lebanon — and some of the explosions left innocent bystanders, including children, injured or dead.

          • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Ok, and what does this refute? I haven’t claimed there to be zero civilian casualties, but it’s currently fewer than one in one thousand.

            Again, I’ve posted video. Why would I believe that could harm anyone but the bearer?