We used to have earbuds that don’t need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn’t get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldEnglish
    34·
    3 个月前

    Not really, no. I’m responding to a comment about cheap buds that break too easily, which isn’t exclusive to wired ones.

    There’s literally no mention of the wired vs wireless aspect in my comment or the one I’m replying to.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.eeEnglish
      44·
      3 个月前

      My friend, the whole thread is about wireless vs. wired. That’s the context your post is in. And you’ve already had several people misunderstanding your intention because it is written in that context without clarification that it’s not supposed to be the same as other comments here.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldEnglish
        14·
        3 个月前

        My friend, the whole thread is about wireless vs. wired

        Not my comment. I’m clearly commenting on a separate aspect. That others try to ascribe a nonexistent secondary meaning that I haven’t so much as hinted at isn’t my fault.

        without clarification that it’s not supposed to be the same as other comments here.

        I’m personally not a big fan of spelling out the obvious, but ok:

        You’re wrong to assume that my comment follows the previous theme from pure proximity and it’s annoying to have to bend over backwards to facilitate the poor reading comprehension (if not bad faith) of people making up their minds about what I’m saying before reading it.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.eeEnglish
          21·
          3 个月前

          I’m clearly commenting on a separate aspect

          You seem to have been overestimated how clear that was.

          That others try to ascribe a nonexistent secondary meaning that I haven’t so much as hinted at isn’t my fault

          That’s just how context works.

          You’re wrong to assume that my comment follows the previous theme from pure proximity and it’s annoying to have to bend over backwards to facilitate the poor reading comprehension (if not bad faith) of people making up their minds about what I’m saying before reading it.

          Idk if you know how conversation work but people typically use and understand context. If you don’t mind people misunderstanding you, then no need to do anything. If you do mind it, it might be helpful to spell things out. But it’s up to you really, I don’t mind either way.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.eeEnglish
              11·
              3 个月前

              You know, a better way to stop the discussion would be to just stop replying and walk away from it. Some might think it a bit rude if you try to order them to stop lol.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldEnglish
                11·
                3 个月前

                Others might think it’s rude to keep going on and on and on about me having the responsibility for your misunderstanding of my completely clear and concise commented and how clearly ANYTHING said within a comment thread is about the same thing, regardless of the words and immediately preceding context.

                I keep answering because part of my mental handicap is impulse control problems. I’m not good at letting it go when people are being wrong and/or obnoxious and refuses to listen to reason.

                What’s YOUR excuse? Why is it so important to you that your misunderstanding be declared the only logical reaction to my comment?

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.eeEnglish
                  21·
                  3 个月前

                  I’m just saying that it clearly (heh) wasn’t that clear since so many misunderstood it. The context threw people off. So I just suggested how it could be avoided and explained why it happened. But it’s your comment, entirely up to you to do with it as you’d like.

                  I think you’re taking this a bit too seriously and a lot more personally than it was intended tbh.

                  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    1·
                    3 个月前

                    I’m just saying that it clearly (heh) wasn’t that clear since so many misunderstood it.

                    Literally you and one other person. That’s not “many” by any definition of the word.

                    The context threw people off

                    Again, you and one other person isn’t “people”

                    So I just ~~suggested how it could be avoided ~~ made shit up and explained why it happened. made some more shit up.

                    There. Now everyone understands.

                    But it’s your comment, entirely up to you to do with it as you’d like.

                    Could have fooled me with gestures towards this entire conversation

                    I think you’re taking this a bit too seriously and a lot more personally than it was intended tbh.

                    Yeah sure, use the “just kidding!” tactic of the stubbornly wrong. My younger brother does that too when he finally realizes that he’s been confidently wrong for half an hour and doesn’t want to admit it.