New 18 year old voters have always been more left wing and 90 year old conservatives have always been falling off the perch. That’s not news.
The analysis does not account for people becoming more likely to vote Conservative as they age, but this traditional trend has begun to break down among younger generations.
This is the real story. This is what’s standing on the party’s oxygen tube. The supply of new conservatives has broken down. It turns out that people don’t get more conservative as they age, they get more conservative as they gain wealth - and today’s 30 and 40 year olds aren’t.
I think there are actually two distinct factors going on here.
The first is that the traditional rightward shift as you age has broken down among millennials, as you note.
The second - and I actually think this is as if not more important - is that the Tories have abandoned the field on left/right ‘economic-based’ politics anyway. Sunak presided over the highest tax burden in 70 years. The Tories’ post-2016 pitch to the electorate has always been about cultural conservativism - Brexit, immigrants, toilets for trans people, etc - not right-wing economics. And unlike left/right issues, there was never a trend for people to become more culturally conservative as they age. People just form their cultural norms and values when they’re young, and then carry these values with them through life, reacting against things that diverge from their norms.
By abandoning economics for culture wars, the Tories have built their electoral castle out of demographic sand. As the people who grew up in an overwhelming white and insular 1950s and 60s Britain give way to Millennials and Gen Zs who grew up in a ethnically diverse EU member state, the Tories have increasingly set themselves up in opposition to the cultural norms of the British electorate - and that is a stench it’s going to be hard for them to shift.
This. So much this.
Folks forget that age not only brings wealth but responsibility. Children debts etc. When the 2 are linked, you end up with more of your life working to protect your income/assets from risk. Than you do forming views on the suffering of others.
If you age without wealth but the. Same responsibilities. The suffering of those arrond you is less clearly related to your income and assets. Because you do not have that protection.
So moving right seems less logical to ensure your own respinsibilities are covered.
Oh, what a pity.
That “assuming nothing else changes” is doing a huge amount of heavy lifting.
Something that I heard a few years ago really demonstrated people’s rightward political shift as they age like nothing else.
Imagine a child born shortly after the end of the Second World War, say 1948-1950. That child would have been a young adult, 18-20, in 1968. That was both the year that the hippie movement gained greatest prominence as well as the year of radical protest where young people around the world organised and fought back against corruption and repression.
Now fast forwards to 2016. Those very same post-war children are now aged 66-68. That’s the demographic that more than any other voted in favour of Brexit. I bet if you’d gone back to those young radicals of '68 and told them they were going to become bigoted, narrow-minded xenophobes they’d have laughed in your face. But it happened.
But that’s the whole problem. People haven’t been turning Tory as they get older. So the Tory base is aging out of the population.
The Torys probably have at least another term of crazy, before they get their ship in order. They’ll have some new “hug a hoodie” centrist leader and stop being so visibly the naughty party.
I’ve heard people say both “young people are more politically conscious than ever” and also “young people are more disengaged/disillusioned from democracy than ever”
Whilst those things can both be true, I think it’s v important now to try and get young people actively engaged with politics.
But also - we should keep trying to get older generations to be kinder, too.
I’ve been told “your generation will make the world right again!” by the generations above mine, since I was in primary school. 20 years later, we’re still waiting for conservatives to die off. If climate change has proven anything, it’s that we should all be doing more than just waiting it out
Logan’s Run it!
Ill assume you are 28+ and have decided its not worth it.
Id offer help. But id likely make it worse.
Oh I’d be toast in Logan’s Run but the sacrifice would be worth it to keep the Tories out.
I think we may need more then just removing the old from logins run.
Older people turn right not due to being old. But due to responsibilities (children also depts etc but mainly children) and the need to protect that wealth to cover responsibilities.
So to ensure we don’t just end up with people turning right at a younger age. We would need to remove generational wealth. IE the whole idea of being able to make life better or worse for your children. As the risk of having nothing to aid your children is the pressure that turns many right.
So we need to move to nationalised breeding programs and state raising of children.
Much like the show indicated.
Honestly add the invention of teleportation and nationalisation of tinder gets us pretty close to how the show managed that as well.
So we need to move to nationalised breeding programs and state raising of children.
That’s been tried, didn’t work out well.
Did you get the very first job you applied for?
Win the very first game of any sport.
Yeah you get the point. As much as I am kidding about removing children from parents etc.
Something failing in the past is not evidence of it invalidity as a solution. Just the need to reevaluate the methodology.
Maybe matrix should be our movie rather the logins run on that part. ;) remove all human interaction untill adult and brainwash the little shitheads to vote appropriately.
Win the very first game of any sport.
I have yet to win any game of sport, unless games count.
Grins no difference here. I wanted to use England World Cup. But other then 66 I have absolutely no idea if we ever won before that.
assuming nothing else changes
Opinion discarded
