Hello nice people,
I’ve been using NiceHash app for some time 5-6 years ago. (It was a simple app for mining cryptocurrency and you get paid in bitcoin on their wallet, then you could transfer bitcoin to another wallet.) It was working fine until they got hacked (or fooled us) and lost all crypto. Luckily I didn’t loose much like some guys did. I decided not to use the service anymore and I’m still receiving stupid e-mail newsletters. I tried to unsubscribe and It asks me for login, I know password, but don’t have 2fa anymore. Also I don’t have backup 16 words.
Now support told me that this is the only way and I feel ridiculous about taking selfie just to unsubscribe. Am I protected against this somehow? I live in Europe and I think Nicehash is located in neighbourhood.
And of course I never wanted to subscribe…and I don’t think I ever verified account with a document.
What are my options other than just filtering that shitty domain as spam?
edit: typo
Nothing says decentralized currency like having a corporation that controls your assets 😋
Don’t point out how all their bullshit requires middlemen and accounts holding their currency to make it work. That makes it looks silly. Almost like it’s just more complicated harder to use money that people can more easily steal from you.
I love talking to tech recruiters… We are a defi startup revolutionizing the financial world… “Cool, so distributed smart contracts, zero knowledge open source swarms?”… no, we run a centralized website where people give us money and we do a thing for them…
Putting the central back in defi. It’s almost like their is willful ignorance in what their own words mean.
Using buzzwords to describe doing something people have been doing for decades or centuries is all the newer big tech companies seem to do. They’re just fancy new middlemen with a shiny interface for us to use.
There are some really cool decentralized concepts that would be fun to work on. But only a tiny handful of companies actually do, it’s usually a open source group doing it.
Makes me mad when I talk to the imposters
A requirement beyond an email address to unsubscribe from an email newsletter is illegal in most western countries.
What’s wrong with filtering their domain?
That looks like a proper request to disable 2FA. Their problem is requiring login to unsubscribe from newsletter emails, which is total BS.
If support won’t take your email out of their list, just block the address / domain and move on, I guess.
I wouldn’t give them any extra personal info after what happened.
This is what I do when I can’t unsubscribe in a minute. No reason to waste time on this, it is a solved problem.
It’s probably not for marketing emails. They probably require login to disable account alerts. Imagine a threat actor gets access to your account, turns off transaction alerts so you aren’t notified, then transfers out all your crypto.
I’m certain the marketing emails don’t require login to unsubscribe.
OP is receiving newsletters
Unsubscribing and disabling 2FA seem like two different things.
GDPR allows for the company to verify your identity before proceeding with deletion. Source: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/reform/rules-business-and-organisations/dealing-citizens/how-should-requests-individuals-exercising-their-data-protection-rights-be-dealt_en
[The company] can ask [you] for additional information in order to confirm the identity of the person making the request.
But if OP did not provide “selfie” during registration, providing it now doesn’t help confirming his identity so it doesn’t fall into that category. I would aks them how do they justify that and if they are trying to discouraged me from deleting the account.
Also, Im not trying to delete account (but that eould be ideal), Im just trying to unsubscribe. I guess it doesnt matter here FML 😂
They should unsubscribe you by simple request and only need your e-mail for that. You could verify by clicking a link in an unsubscribe email.
They can’t ask for more information than what they needed to create your account.
But maybe they’re seen as a bank and then they have to confirm your identity with a copy of your id.
Ive never heard of bank asking selfie. I wouldnt even provide ID, but that would make bit more sense
In Germany I’ve had multiple contracts that needed identification. They use trustworthy third party services for verification though.
KYC (Know Your Costumor) Here you have a small overview.
When you create an account online, a selfie along with a copy of your id is deemed minimal verification.
Ive used face scanning on some other crypto service, but didnt know its a thing in banking. Thanks for sharing, but it still doesnt explain why I need that just to unsubscribe. I could accept that they are trying to protect me, but they obviously have diferent plans. My experience and recent communication with support proved NiceHash is ran buy toxic garbage and not by people who run a bank or anything close to that.
They need to be sure it’s you who’s unsubscribing, I suppose. There’s been enough social engineering to not rely on emails only.
I see that selfie is the only solution to unsubscribe (if not involving lawyer or just spam filter).
I understand what you are saying, but If I lost my email why would they send newsletter to a new owner? It just makes no sense since 99% can be unsubscribed with no login or whatever they ask.
Sorry, its hard to accept any safety meassure as explanation due to bad reputation of NiceHash. Also after talking to human support I just feel even less safe tbh, but it doesnt surprise me at all, its company that took my crypto back in a day.
Ill try fake pic when I get some time to burn
Thanks for the link. Feels bad tho 😭 gdpr gave me Accept/Reject cookies and some more pain as a bonus it seems 😂
GDPR didn’t give you cookie banners, it’s shitty websites that do.
If they were to just follow activated “Do not Track”-Preferences, they wouldn’t need to ask, instead they would deactived them by default. Or you could just not use cookies, it’s not like somebody forces you to give cookies out to your website’s users.
Read the other replies to the parent comment. This is not on GDPR.
Probably an unpopular opinion - but I actually think requesting overriding 2fa is a big deal and companies shouldn’t do that lightly. If I had a lot of money in crypto I would sure hope the exchange would scrutinize a request to turn off 2fa. And if op had saved their backup words they wouldn’t have been in this situation.
Now requiring that to change an email subscription is not great, but again - turning off 2fa without the proper backup options should be difficult and scrutinized.
Requiring logging in to unsubscribe is absolutely bullshit. I mark all emails as spam that don’t automatically unregister with ONLY clicking a lick. I’m not providing my email, I’m not logging in.
It’s probably not for marketing emails. They probably require login to disable account alerts. Imagine a threat actor gets access to your account, turns of transaction alerts so you aren’t notified, then transfers out all your crypto.
I’m certain the marketing emails don’t require login to unsubscribe.
I was with you till your last sentence, I’ve seen multiple companies require account login to disable marketing emails. It’s a dark web pattern to keep their subscription numbers high, by adding a lot of friction to unsubscribing. Those companies can go fuck themselves, but they exist in numbers
For bypassing 2fa this does seem reasonable. But anyone who can access the email address should have the permission to unsubscribe from messages.
For example on my service there is the concept of a “primary email” which is the only one that can be used to reset the password. But even if you have lost the password and access to your primary email you can still unsubscribe any other email from notifications as long as you can show access to that particular email. You won’t regain access to the account but you can turn off emails.
For marketing emails I totally agree.
For important account security and verification emails, no I don’t think that should be done without being able to log into the account.
If somebody breaks into your email, they shouldn’t be able to compromise everything silently
This is a good point. Maybe you could have some sort of exit plan such as 3 emails confirming that you have been unsubscribed at 1d, 30d and 365d. This way if the email takeover is temporary then the user will eventually see a warning but there is still a finite amount of emails still to be received.
It isn’t perfect, because an attacker could set up filters or something so that these aren’t noticed. But at this point the attacker could set up a filter to hide the regular account emails so it really isn’t any worse.
I think in most cases confirming you own the email should be sufficient to unsubscribe.
In high security situations there should be a more extensive method, but it should still be possible. Perhaps the timed unsubscribe, i.e. a month of access. Or mailing a letter to the account holders address. (I.e. take 4 weeks to give the account holder time to opt out)
ahh, the sponsor from LTT that mined your PC while at idle :)
I actually made enough each month to pay rent for almost 2 years during the Covid pandemic (subtracted the energy bill).
I made enough to pay for the 3080 I was mining on and heat my office in the winter at the same time.
You should just block them. Otherwise try with ai generated images, i heard midjourney works really good. But if you wanna cause damage threat to sue them if they dont whant to unsubcribe. You can probably do it since you are on european union and they take this type of shit seriously afaik, probably could do something aboit the money you lost too if it turms out they where being fishy aboit it.
Thanks. Im not gonna sue them, but I might report that if I find the right address. Ill first wait for their response to my last email. Thx for input
If you really want to be keep using the service, get a non watermarked random guy’s pic (he must be holding something) from the internet, write what they want on a paper and edit the pic so that the guy is holding what you wrote. This might not work because of the personal ID requirement but trying it doesn’t hurt.
They usually have a face detection algorithm running along with ocr and rarely check if this is a stock photo. I need to use Instagram to be in the loop. They blocked my account for using Barinsta so I did this and they unblocked it.
Hehe this made me laugh. Thank you!
Your story is also about nicehash? I might do that if I manage to digure out that pic. I will try
No. I was banned from Instagram. Good luck! Hope it works for you :p
Don’t send any data that you haven’t sent already! Just block 'em f out, feels so nice :D Or they’ll demand a nude selfie next time!
If I ever send picture it will be nude selfie for sure 😂
deleted by creator
I can’t speak for Europe, but a certified letter saying in no uncertain terms that you don’t wish to be contacted again, sent to their legal department should carry the day.
If you have a lawyer friend, bonus points for saying all future correspondence must go through your legal representative, and no other methods (email, phone, sms) are welcome. I believe that notice carries legs in the US.
In europe I suspect the GDPR should let you get all your data, and account removed without jumping through their hoops.
If its just to verify does that mean they already have the information on record, like their picture? If not whats stopping someone from using someone elses picture and photo editing in the requirements?
They dont have a picture, but they have some information, probably a minimum that was required to create account. I dont remember exactly, it was long time ago. Photo editing requires skill and time. Maybe I can ask AI 😂
I would just block their shit in email
Yup. I try to unsubscribe nicely once. If it isn’t honored they are going straight on my provider’s spam list.
I mean, just mark as spam?
It hurts them more if a bunch of people mark them as spam and it becomes a trend doesn’t it? Just seems like a design issue on their part.
I always figured that companies generally wanted to avoid that.
