• Riker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Linux will never be a home operating system for most people. It will not even come close to windows or Mac. It is not user friendly, it is not supported by the VAST majority of home use software and it has too many distros. No one wants to get with an OS when the first question is which version. The learning curve is too steep and when stuff goes wrong it is way harder to find and solve.

    It’s nice that yall like it but the amount of forceful shoving of Linux on lemmy is hysterical knowing how no one listens.

    • Temperche@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      5 months ago

      The discussions on Lemmy were exactly what made me try out Linux, and now I’m an avid Linux’er. +1 for Linux.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s no harm in telling people about Linux though. The majority of people who can figure out the fediverse probably have the requisite technical skills to figure out Linux. Yeah I agree it’ll never be a home OS for most people, but also many homes don’t even have a PC at all anymore.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        This, today PC means laptop, that’s what almost everyone who has a PC uses, most people do with just a tablet though. 95% of the garbage people use the internet for can be done on a mid range smart phone. The people who need high powered desktop devices or use them for entertainment are already a minority in the market for computing devices. The largest chunk of OS marketshare is decided by business purchases, not individual PC owners.

      • x4740N@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem is when people get militant and / or hostile about it

      • Riker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        There is a large difference between telling someone and then getting mass downvoting anyone who dares oppose Linux while throwing a hissyfit and claiming that Linux is the greatest thing since oxygen. Lemmy is on the latter, not the former.

    • BodaciousMunchkin@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      This kind of self-fulfilling prophecy is what will drive down even more support for Linux. The thing we need to do right now is to let more people try out Linux so that corporations will see Linux as a potential target on the desktop and make products for Linux, not the opposite like what you are saying.

      • Riker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Me: Linux won’t work because Linux people push it too hard despite it having multiple downsides in comparison to the more widely used OS

        You: NO, YOU JUST NEED TO USE LINUX

        • spittingimage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You: “Linux will never be a popular OS.”

          Him: “I think it actually can be if we --”

          You: “WERE YOU NOT LISTENING?!”

          It’s fitting that you used a gif of Riker before he grew the beard.

          • Riker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Funny how I literally quoted the part of my post that was relevant and you still blindly ignored it. Blind subservience… Gotta be a Linux fanboy

      • x4740N@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        My post (on my other lemmy account before I switched this one to my main) sharing a video by a youtuber that said some open source software was badly designed in terms of UI and how it could be improved received so much hostility that I got fed up and ended up deleting it

        It wasn’t even a negative video, my post wasn’t even negative

        What was the point of sharing it if people just react hostile towards it even though you shared it in good faith

        The bad design with some open source software is why I don’t use some of them and why I haven’t installed Linux as a dual boot operating system yet

        I use blender and krita because they have good designs with the gui and its catered towards the user using the software in this case creatives

        Gimp however and other badly designed open source software don’t cater GUI towards the user demographics that would be using them

    • Donebrach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agreed, I don’t get the argument for using Linux beyond vague “windows bad” hand waving. Frankly, having to use computers probably every hour of my waking life for work and entertainment, I find nothing wrong with windows, or Mac OS. Or iOS or iPad OS beyond just the idiosyncratic annoyances each OS brings to the table. Is there any tangible reason Linux is superior to all the other OSs out there beyond it being open source? Also how is being open spurce objectively a benefit?

      • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Privacy/no data mining is (frankly) a huge deal and a major problem in modern society is that this is not valued at all. To me, this is really analogous to the climate crisis in the sense that we’ve known about the impending climate crisis for decades and no one valued it till we got to the point of no return/crisis point. I really cannot emphasise enough what a big deal it is to value your data/information/privacy.

        Other than that, Linux really is a functional OS and there will be other benefits like multiple desktop styles to choose from, the possibility to do more advanced things if you need to (if learn how), the OS is virus-free, better performance (because the computer doesn’t need to work so hard on your OS and can spend that energy on other things), giving life to old hardware that Windows no longer supports (and saving your money as well as the planet from thr e-waste), the importance of an alternative choice so the market is not monopolised by predator corporate giants. There will be loads more benefits, but those are a few to begin with.

        It also has downsides (as mentioned above).

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Doesn’t it use less system resources?

        When Windows 10 isn’t supported anymore, better to use Linux than have an unsecure computer or buy a new computer.

        • Zangoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          For me windows uses 3-5gb of ram on idle just after starting up. This is pretty consistent across multiple computers for me. On the same computers (I dual-boot on both my laptop and desktop) Linux idles at about 800mb-1.2gb. This was even true on KDE which was one of the “heavier” feature-rich desktop environments. I think Gnome might have been 1.5gb ish but I haven’t used in a while. Either way, it used way less RAM than my windows installs which could noticeably impact some resource intensive programs like blender or davinci resolve

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      not supported by the VAST majority of home use software

      Just want to say most people only need a browser, and it’s only going to continue on that path. That’s why ChromeOS works.

    • karashta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      As someone with decision paralysis and executive dysfunction issues, this is true for me. I’m probably more than capable of using it for a daily driver but there are 5000 flavors and I will likely never be able to make a solid choice until one is obviously vastly superior in some way I need.

    • iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      To lump my own personal bitch onto this: liking a thing and bringing it up regardless of conversation or context isn’t a personality

    • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      You are wrong. The reason that linux isn’t popularvis that windows comes preinstalled in computers and most people don’t know how to install an operating system pet along what an operating system is. Linux is dead easy nowadays, ao.much that my tech illiterate parents can use it, spread misinformation elsewhere

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve seen more criticism of Lemmy’s Linux Problem, than I actually have seen LLP in action