• itsJoelle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is part of the reason I bicker with Liberals about appealing to electoralism all the damn time. Great, we technically got a “D” win, but the party installed a senator that doesn’t vote with the party and pulls the senate more “center” as they try to scoop up disaffected conservatives. So, they effectively installed their own opposition. Well done.

    Very much the smartest people in the room.

    Note: venting, and I’m not talking about individuals just the collective “wisdom” of belt-way liberals.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The party didn’t “install” him. He got elected in an R+22 state as a former governor with excellent rapport and name recognition. He’s just about the only “Democrat” who could be elected in a blood red coal mining state. If the party abandoned their approach and threw their weight behind someone more left-leaning, they’d be absolutely clobbered and we’d all be hemming and hawing about WV being a total loss Republican wasteland for the next few generations. At least this way we get someone who’s willing to confirm judges and meet with the party behind closed doors.

      edit: Not to mention the event he’s skipping is to celebrate the most aggressive climate/clean energy legislation in the history of this country. And he’s campaigning in a coal mining state. That’d be like a Ukrainian general attending a dinner party with the Kremlin. NOT a good look.

      • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        These are good points, and maybe I was less articulate because I was responding to the article grumpily. A more accurate statement would be “I’m sick of pundits and beltway liberals telling me what policy positions aren’t ‘possible’ while being wildly popular amongst the electorate on both sides of the political spectrum. Instead of running on that they opt to play percentage points, message on issues that don’t upset their donors, and drift the party’s platform increasingly in the interest of the corpos over decades as they back candidates closer to the center instead.”

        Now, Manchin might not be the best candidate to voice this opinion on: because electorally, you’re right, the partisan bias was too great in that state. But, man, I heard the quote from an Obama staffer during the Georgia run-off: “Stacy Abrams is teaching us the power of directly campaigning on improving material conditions.” I was gob smacked that they spoke about this as though it was a revelation. If you want the exact quote I can dig through my podcasts and find it.

        However, I might push back slightly on him appearing in a legislation event as some virtuous gesture. He himself was instrumental in including little exceptions in previous bills for auctioning off land for drilling, explorations for new drill sites, and continues to push that our reliance on oil as a place borne of pragmatism and not at all influenced by his donations.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t disagree at all that Democrats have utterly failed to prioritize working class economic issues over the past few decades and have capitulated to the liberal elite ruling class that prefers to focus on issues that don’t undermine their stranglehold on the economy. I just know that in order to win WV in an environment where that ruling class still calls a stupid amount of shots, a Democrat has to chart their own course and be seen as fiercely independent of that ruling class. That goes double if they hope to win repeatedly.

          Additionally, you misread me. I’m not saying him appearing at the IRA event is a virtuous gesture. It’s precisely because of the demands of his constituents that he can neither support nor campaign on that law. I’m saying that he’s opting out because it would look TERRIBLE for him to support a law that essentially puts a bulls-eye on whatever economic future WV has left.

      • aidan@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s just about the only “Democrat” who could be elected in a blood red coal mining state.

        Plenty of Democrats get elected in majority red states- like Andy Beshear

        • CMLVI@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I live in WV.

          We ain’t electing a D. Manchin was as good as it’s gonna get here, and by all accounts he’s pretty shit. It’s a running joke that people call him Maserati Manchin cause he’s only ever here in his Maserati, electing to live in DC on his houseboat.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah Beshear won with a 0.4% margin in an R+16 state over a catastrophically unpopular governor who drove his own reputation into the dirt by taking braindead position after braindead position on things like abortion, school funding, and cockfighting. WV has another SIX percentage points of partisan lean toward Republicans. My assertion stands.

    • aidan@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      party installed a senator that doesn’t vote with the party

      People complain about “two-partyism” and tribalism- then complain about senators voting with their beliefs or their constituents rather than the party.

    • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      OMG having this argument with people is maddening. Their refusal to think logically makes me want to bash my head on a wall

        • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For my own understanding, I want to have it explained to me how it was unhinged!

          Granted, voicing the take as I did pertaining to Manchin likely isn’t the smartest due to his electorate demographics, but I can recall a few cases where Democrat party officials threw their weight behind more center primary candidates as an appeal towards the center.

          Edit: I suppose my umbrige is with how those candidates coincidentally happen to favor neo-liberal tendencies and don’t advocate for working class or on environmental issues. Cause, man, what a dream it would be to have an actual left party as opposed to a center and right.

      • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        On Lemmy people deriding liberals are very often farther left, not conservatives.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Liberal” in this context is from a socialist/communist lens. It’s not what the US calls “liberal”. It’s just another name for a capitalist, as in what Adam Smith defined. “Economic” liberalism.