In its submission to the Australian government’s review of the regulatory framework around AI, Google said that copyright law should be altered to allow for generative AI systems to scrape the internet.

    • SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      So works derived from other works should not be copyrightable? Oh wait, that’s specifically allowed. As long as it’s not being reproduced 1:1 then it falls under fair use. The argument that one should get paid for that is absurd. You can’t copyright the idea of something. If that were the case then you could never write another poem or novel or short story because someone already did that and to do so would be “stealing.” It would be ridiculous.

      • LastOneStanding@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You have really meandered off the path of what I was talking about. But please, meander. It’s interesting.

        • SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well, that’s what the person you replied to was saying. Essentially the “AI” is only reading the book, it’s not copying the book.

          I could rewrite the entire Lord of the rings series in my own words and it wouldn’t be copyright infringement. I could sit there with the movies on repeat and the books all open for reference, I don’t owe the rights holder anything in that case, as long as I’m but reproducing their work.

          • Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            They’re just trolling. Feel free to block and ignore, it’s the best way of dealing with them until moderation is more reliable.

              • LastOneStanding@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I might have applied and i wasn’t being a dick. you removed my comment because why? you think the lord of the rings was written for grown-ups or something? time to test you and see how outlandish you can be. i’ll think twice about participating here. not a safe place for me when I haven’t said anything wrong. fortunately for me, technology isn’t my specialty. it’s literature. so, say goodbye to me from your community. also, didn’t appreciate your insult. I’m from the community you’re from. the comment from the other person came from another instance. you have nothing to worry about. in technology you won’t hear a peep from me, because I learned how this place works. humanities and cultural literacy is not appreciated here.

                • Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yeah, sorry, you’ve been interacting in bad faith in this entire thread. We will not allow that kind of behaviour here.

              • LastOneStanding@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                What is this person’s audience? I’m not it. I guess they should have not picked me. LMAO. Poor kid. I just want to give the poor kid a huge hug, bake some Nestle Toll House cookies, and we can Netflix and chill to the whole Lord of the Rings plus the Hobbit. You know, because I have a heart, and this person needs this. Not that I’d enjoy any of it, I’d just be totally sacrificing my whole identity in favor, just to be helpful and all. LMAO

            • nackmack@plesiosaur.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              @LastOneStanding @SkepticElliptic ok but YA is more likely to have interesting queer relationships as far as stuff that I can find in a library or at a bookstore. All the adult queer literature tends to be sold online and the authors themselves have to do most of the promoting.

    • Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Bizarre amount of assumptions in your ignorant wall of text post. I’m an attorney that’s worked in copyright for small artists and creators. In my current job i fight back against the tech giants and try to reign in specifically Google Amazon and Meta with consumer protection regulations. The fuck are you?

      • LastOneStanding@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m a person that has the same clout around here as you. You’re an anonymous rando unless you wish to advertise your legal services, put your name and pic up here for people to see and seek your services, which you are more than welcome to do. Until then, guess who I and you are? Nobody with an opinion. Welcome, Nobody, Attorney at Law. You just got irritated and you can’t do shit about it.

        • Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t need to prove anything to you, but your now multiple wall of text rambling screeds say nothing except ignorant insults. If you want to actually engage with the issue, be my guest. Refute what I’ve said, or something new, or idk, at least interesting. You’re just being irritating for irritating sake, otherwise. You don’t have the same “clout” (lmao what is this, recess?) because you haven’t actually brought anything to the discussion.