Gretchen Whitmer responds to calls by some Democrats to vote ‘uncommitted’ in Michigan’s primary on Tuesday

Gretchen Whitmer, the Michigan governor, pushed back on calls to not vote for Joe Biden over his handling of the Israel-Gaza conflict, saying on Sunday that could help Trump get re-elected.

“It’s important not to lose sight of the fact that any vote that’s not cast for Joe Biden supports a second Trump term,” she said on Sunday during an interview on CNN’s State of the Union. “A second Trump term would be devastating. Not just on fundamental rights, not just on our democracy here at home, but also when it comes to foreign policy. This was a man who promoted a Muslim ban.”

Whitmer, who is a co-chair of Biden’s 2024 campaign, also said she wasn’t sure what to expect when it came to the protest vote.

Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat who is the only Palestinian-American serving in Congress, urged Democrats last week to vote “uncommitted” in Michigan’s 27 February primary.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s a fucking primary

    I don’t know why people don’t get this.

    Since 2000 progressives have been told to vote for who you want in the primary and then hold your nose in the general.

    Now we’re supposed to hold our nose in the primary, too?!

    I don’t have enough clothespins for this bullshit.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Since 2000 progressives have been told to vote for who you want in the primary and then hold your nose in the general.

      NH went progressive over party favorite moderate the last two primaries they had that counted…

      So this party the DNC said their votes count for nothing, then Biden withdrew and threw money at a write in campaign so the headlines would be “Biden wins even as a write in!”

      And not:

      “DNC just made NH primary meaningless for something only NH republican officials could change!”

      They know this is just a primary.

      They’re just conservatives deep down and give zero fucks lying and destroying democracy if they win. And it’s not enough to win, they demand 100% loyalty.

      Just like trumpers.

      It’s why Dem standards can’t just be “better than a Republican”.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        it’s why the democratic party is going to fracture.

        Hopely only slightly after the republican party. But both are trying to be the last one standing, so to speak.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Now we’re supposed to hold our nose in the primary, too?!

      “Behave, or else you get the Orange Turd.” seems to be the message.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      The problem is Progressives aren’t offering up any other option. Who am I supposed to vote FOR this time around? “No one” isn’t much of a rallying cry.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Why should they? the DNC will never allow a progressive to be the party candidate. which is why we didn’t have bernie in '16… like the VOTERS WANTED.

        • qprimed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I would say 2020 was the real stinger… clyburn in south carolina playing king maker.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            New Hampshire went for Sanders in 2020, and were punished by losing their primary representation in 2024. South Carolina proved pivotal to the Biden campaign, so they’re rewarded by going first.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yuuuup. There were plenty of better states to choose if they just wanted a less-white state. Georgia is diverse and actually in play, but instead we kick off with a state that’s deep red with an ineffectual Democratic party because they voted the way the winners liked.

        • SaltySalamander@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If the voters wanted Bernie in '16, they could have gotten off of their collective asses and voted for him. He was on every single state ballot. The fact is, more voters voted for Hillary.

        • FoxBJK@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because in 2020 the progressive candidate was the front runner. 4 years later they have no one else to offer up? No wants to vote for Biden. This is the progressive caucus’s moment, and they’re failing to respond to what the voters want.

            • FoxBJK@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Then to be quite honest that’s something progressives need to focus on and work through if they want to be taken seriously going forward. Railing against Biden will only get them so far. At the end of the day, voters need something to be in favor of, to rally behind.

            • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Progressivism is a marble on a hill. Either they roll to the right and join the liberals because they support and believe in an unjust hierarchical system as long as it’s sufficiently pinkwashed or roll hard left because they see the issue is the system itself

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            If progressives had put someone up against an incumbent they would have been accused of wanting Trump to win.

            Also, their candidate would be deemed unelectable and voting for them in the primary would be helping Trump to win.

            Also, America is not a progressive country and even if they won the nomination they’d probably lose.

            Why? Because America wants this shitshow. Why else would they keep choosing it? They don’t want problems solved, they want arguments and hot takes and “slams” and “bashes.”

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            There are great progressive candidates running. You just don’t see it because the DNC is hard at work behind the scenes canceling primaries, removing candidates from the ballot, instructing the corporate media to not report on it, and sending out people like Whitmer to manufacture consent for there being no actual primary debates or competition.

            Biden’s ego demands a second term, there’s no voter choice involved here.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        I cannot remember an election where the incumbent got primaried. And even if we tried we’d be accused of hurting the establishment candidate’s chances in the general.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s nothing in this article that indicates she’s talking about the primary vs the general election