“Even though he’s entitled to his opinions, he’s not entitled to his own set of facts”

During a broadcast of Donald Trump’s speech at a “Get Out the Vote” rally in Rock Hill, South Carolina on Friday evening, Fox News host Neil Cavuto cut into the footage to point out inaccuracies in what was being said by the former president and 2024 Republican frontrunner.

Taking issue with Trump claiming credit for the market going up while, in the same breath, blaming Biden for inflated gas prices and whatever else, Cavuto said, “We’ll continue monitoring the president’s remarks and I mean no offense to him or some of you who might want to continue to hear him, but I did have to say that even though the former president is entitled to his opinions, he’s not entitled to his own set of facts.”

  • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wow…absolutely blown away. I literally never thought I’d see journalistic integrity from anyone even loosely associated with FauxNews…

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          They don’t care about his overall popularity, they only care about his popularity with their viewing demographic, and he’s as popular with that demo as he’s ever been. More so, honestly.

          Remember Trump won more votes in 2020 than 2016, and his popular vote percentage rose by 0.7%. The fact he still had that much after 4 years of his shit tells you everything you need to know about these voters.

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        My understanding is they could play all the videos of Trump saying bullshit they want, just not assert it themselves. They could repeat it but be careful to say “Person x alleges this” rather than stating mistruths as fact.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t know if this is so much them being scared, the vibe I’m getting here is that the anchor finally feels like he can get away with being a bit of a real journalist, when before he would be reprimanded by the network.

    • blargerer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fox news’ reporters have always been reasonable, maybe on the low end of reasonable, but reasonable. The thing that makes Fox as a network awful is their opinion people, and how much they blur the line between their opinion people and their reporters.

    • coffinwood@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      Could be opportunism. Fox senses that Trump might go to prison or get barred from the election in another way, and so they either prepare endorsing a different candidate or are simply cautious.

      But it’s journalism by accident at best.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        Fox never actually wanted Trump, but they radicalized their viewers too much. They tried to criticize him before while he was president, but each time they did their ratings went down and OAN’s went up.

    • Jaderick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wouldn’t necessarily call it integrity. I think Faux News has realized they created a monster that lost them a ton of viewers to even worse garbage at Newsmax. They’re trying to walk it all back now.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      They ought to know that since they were first to call Arizona for Biden, they will be first against the wall if he is re-elected

  • squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Cavuto went on to shoot down his claim that gas prices are at $6 a gallon, sourcing the real price as being an average of $3.26 a gallon.

    Good. I’m so sick of the wild bullshit like that this baboon makes up. Gas is around 2.80 where I live which seems quite cheap given that it was that price 20 years ago and everything else has gone up so much. Then, of course, there’s the fact a lot of people are super-confused about that presidents don’t set the price of gas.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      9 months ago

      Back in the day if you couldn’t nail the price of a gallon of milk you were an out of touch elite. Trump hasn’t bought gas himself in decades I’m sure. That’s the lesson people should take from this.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      people are super-confused about that presidents don’t set the price of gas.

      It seems to be mostly one side of aisle that can’t grasp it. Always the same line of “gas was so much cheaper under trump…”

      and I always reply with “well you should have seen the gas prices under clinton, you would be a massive fan!”.

      It usually goes as well as you’d expect it to.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Lower gas prices means less profit for their nepotistic buddies who own the fuel companies.

          These are the folks who donate to their reelection PACs to keep them marketable to the population with ads.

          These lost politicians don’t want to bite the hand that feeds because at the end of the day the population won’t support them based on ideals, they have to spew propaganda around and that shit is expensive.

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Well you can do the same thing the founders of the towns in your areas did when they formed those towns and move to where a fiscal living can be made based not on what the past looks like but what the proposed future looks like.

              That industry is killing the planet and I’d be more than willing to sacrifice some corporate towns across the board to lessen the blow from our ecology collapsing completely.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        “But Clinton was 30 years ago!”

        “And it was low during the trumpet reign when there was a pandemic. So you do understand that different time periods affect prices.”

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      After all the maths for gallons to liters and euros to dollars and vice versa, gas where I live is about $8.50.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not a coincidence that the strategic oil reserves are at a historic low.

      • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Biden saw the supply chain issues from covid and played the oil reserve game pretty much perfectly. I think his experience was very beneficial in the transition out of covid.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, good luck with that.

    Once you radicalize someone, it’s not always so easy to bring them back. They can just migrate to even more hardcore Russian propaganda outlets.

    • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s true. Time and time again these fools are radicalizing their base, and then when it gets out of hand they can’t rein it in and it bites them.

      Fox and a handful of right-wing politicians made radicalizing into a profitable business that’s not regulated and freely available to anyone with no scruples and an imagination.

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Let’s not forget social media companies and their algorithms that take advantage of human psychology to drive profits. Not helping.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The people that far gone started pissing on Fox News the day they said Biden won the election. Maybe even a little before that.

      I get the distinct impression Fox thinks it can pivot to a different set of subscribers as its armchair-bound geriatric viewers die of Covid and old age.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe. We’ll have to see if this is a one time thing where the anchor is going to get yelled at and never done again, or if it flags a new editorial direction.

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      As MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml pointed out, Tucker leaving Fox has done wonders for Fox, but ended up creating that more hardcore Russian propaganda outlet you are talking about. I mean, an interview with Putin, how much more Russian propaganda can it get?

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      They can just migrate to even more hardcore Russian propaganda outlets.

      RT?

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    I like to think the Nazi Booth and the Ending Democracy Speech at CPAC is about where a lot of “fiscal” Conservatives jump ship.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Niiiiice, unless I’m missing a joke, or maybe you’re trying to make it hiss.

      But thank you for not stretching the silent e!

      “Niceeeee” bugs me so bad.

      • Szymon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Funny you mention that, because I had written your version first, but changed it when I checked an original source (south park meme) to confirm the spelling. Sounding it out, I would say it’s accurate that I’m hissing the c, slowing down and dragging out the end of the word.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ah, in that case the problem isn’t you, it’s the letter c! I’m sure you realized that while -ce hisses, -cc clicks. But unless you stick esses in there, which further confound the spelling, niccce is all you can do. Thanks for not getting mad, and have a good weekend!

          • Szymon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            I appreciate your desire to ensure respect for the language. Take care!

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Fired from Gestapo for excessive violence