• PeeOnYou [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    this was due to a completely insecure online network that the CIA was running that was open like swiss cheese… Iran, Russia, and China were all watching it and marking down operatives and cia human int networks before they rolled them up

      • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’s a combination of different things. The US admitted that Iran shared info with China and Russia after cracking their websites, but the case with China was much more severe. I think the supposed mole was a patsy, but I don’t think Iran caused it.

        The cause of the leak that killed the agents was disputed by investigators, with some believing a mole was responsible, others believed the CIA comms system was hacked.

        The CIA and FBI has and always will be racist. They usually suspect non-white agents of being the mole while ignoring white agents lol.

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I believe that’s a different situation, or at least it contributed to the CIA’s downfall in China but not entirely. The west reported on Iran helping China after that debacle, but it’s possible that the reporting was limited hangout.

      Admit that your spies have died and say because someone snitched or because Iran hacked your websites and helped China, but don’t admit that China had the capabilities to do it themselves or that your agency is compromised to maintain morale.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/22/us/politics/jerry-lee-china-spying.html

      I’m leaning on the limited hangout theory because they had no evidence on the supposed mole even though he “admitted” to everything.