NegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoFederal appeals court rules Texas book bans likely violate Constitutionthehill.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down11
arrow-up1148arrow-down1external-linkFederal appeals court rules Texas book bans likely violate Constitutionthehill.comNegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squarecannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up11·9 months agoThat is the wording they often use on injunctions. As there has not been a full trial they like to keep it as “likely”.
minus-squareIt's A Faaaahhkeah!@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoAhh so it’s like “Allegedly”, a legal safety net.
minus-squareNegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·9 months agoI was confused on that as well.
Likely…LIKELY?!
That is the wording they often use on injunctions. As there has not been a full trial they like to keep it as “likely”.
Ahh so it’s like “Allegedly”, a legal safety net.
I was confused on that as well.