• Zippy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    He hasn’t been convicted of sedation yet and the impeachments did not pass the Senate for removal. Basically that is like an acquittal.

    Agree what is wrong with the US but legally it is still up in the air.

    • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This take is wildly ahistorical. Confederates were barred from office without being impeached. Impeachment is not mentioned in the 14th amendment at all. In fact, it explicitly mentions a remedy for people who have committed insurrection: the Congress can vote by 2/3 majority to reinstate an insurrectionist’s right to hold public office.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well that too with Trump and Epstein. But I may have meant sedition.

    • BassaForte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      But it shouldn’t still legally be in the air. He’s already been proven to be a traitor.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree with that. Shouldn’t still be legally up in the air. Proven in public opinion, sure. Legal proven no.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Basically that is like an acquittal.

      Not really. He has still been impeached, it’s just his own party chose not to remove him from office over the impeachment.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes we knew that. The point is legally he has been acquitted. Fair or not he has not been officially convicted and thus this can not be used to eliminate him from running for office.

        I know people here don’t agree with it. I wish he was convicted myself. But it’s is not grey. It is ‘not really’. Your either convicted or acquitted and he was the latter because that is how the constitution works. Now use your vote should it come to that.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          But it isn’t an acquittal, and he has officially been impeached.

          It’s more like he was found guilty but then given no punishment at sentencing.

          • Zippy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That absolutely is not what impeachments is. Look it up. Impeachments is equivalent to charging someone only. It then basically comes to the house to investigate it and decide if he is guilty. Guilty meaning removed from office. I don’t understand why people do not know this.

            Ya I think he is slimy and likely should have been revoved from office. That that takes 2/3 of the Senate vote. But not getting 2/3 of the vote does not mean he is innocent.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              That absolutely is not what impeachments is.

              I wasn’t trying to say that was what impeachment is, rather that is what impeachment is like.

              Impeachment is inredibly serious and rare. What we have faced is nothing like anything the founding fathers could have predicted. As such, any textual analysis would be flawed - the Founding Fathers could not - and WOULD NOT - have allowed Trump.

              Trump has already far surpassed this line in the sand, not just from my own personal viewpoint but from the view point of almost every point of reasoning. I can confidently say that Trump instigated insurrection and is guilty of such far beyond the justification of any reasonable proceedings, such that I can do so without any real fear of reprecussions from the legal system - Donald Trump is objectively proven to be a criminal and a conman.

              People who deny this fact are simply delusionsal and have no bases beyond being bitter losers to say otherwise.

              Donald Trump is a loser, and his supporters are merely gullible losers who are also poor.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The point is legally he has been acquitted.

          No he hasn’t. Impeachment is a political process, not a legal one. He hasn’t been legally charged yet, though that process is in the works. It’s taking a long time, because the seditious conspiracy plot was insanely large and wide-reaching. It’s the largest criminal conspiracy in the history of the nation, absolutely dwarfing Watergate which took 3.5 years.

          Impeachment is a political remedy more akin to being fired than criminally charged, and is not required to invoke the 14th.