When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death.

The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Meh…

    The wealthy are wealthier, everyone else is worse off.

    No. Everyone is not worse off. That’s simply false. The economy was in free-fall when Trump left office and unemployment was sky-high. Yes, prices are higher now and that is not good, but people can now afford to pay for food because they have jobs.

    And those economy gains are mostly from record breaking fossil fuels, and if you haven’t noticed, the climate isn’t exactly doing great.

    Okay? That would have been the case regardless.

    Have you ever even talked to someone who is transgendered? Shit isn’t exactly going great for that demographic.

    Yes I have, and it was much worse under Trump.

    https://www.hrc.org/news/the-list-of-trumps-unprecedented-steps-for-the-lgbtq-community

    Biden could" have used those two years to codify abortion

    How? Exactly how could he have achieved this? Please detail it.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Giving Biden credit for more jobs after the pandemic is like saying Bill Clinton’s pro corporate policies caused the dotcom boom…

      Or that it was his over zealous crackdown on nonviolent offenders that caused the decline in crime rate and not the normal effect of banning leaded gas decades earlier, something that we saw across the globe on the same timeline after they banned it.

      You’re doing the same thing Republicans do, giving credit to your “team” for things that would have happened anyways.

      And waaaaaay over exaggerating how much got fixed.

      How? Exactly how could he have achieved this? Please detail it.

      How does anything get made a law?

      We had two years where Dems controlled the House, Senate, and presidency…

      If you’re saying it’s not Bidens fault nothing got done, how is it he’s the one that got literally anything else done?

      You’re making it out to be Biden has zero power, but you just gave him credit for increasing fossil fuels production?

      Is there any logic behind this to you? Or are you just saying every good the ng is only because of Biden, and every bad thing is something he couldn’t do.

      Who honestly believes that?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        We had two years where Dems controlled the House, Senate, and presidency…

        No. We had two years where Dems controlled the House and the Presidency and were challenged at every move by Sinema and Manchin. What specifically would have convinced Sinema and, especially, Manchin to agree to codify abortion? Because, if you weren’t aware, the Democrats did try to codify abortion and Manchin specifically blocked it.

        So what should they have done to convince Manchin? Or do you think they could have convinced a Republican to take their side? Because I sure as hell don’t.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          and were challenged at every move by Sinema and Manchin

          I’d take that as an excuse if Biden hasn’t spent the whole primary and election telling us that he can get dem legislation thru a Republican Senate…

          Then we (luckily) end up with 50 D senators, and Biden told us it was pointless to try.

          That doesn’t really change anything, because Biden was already expecting to have to fight a Republican Senate and get a couple votes.

          Hell, the whole reason we got 50 was the GA runoff when Biden was still saying 50 D’s would be enough to pass the whole platform.

          Do you think Joe “Senate whisperer” Biden just didn’t know who Manchin was?

          If so, why couldn’t he still get those few R votes he promised he could get?