The animating concept behind the Trump campaign will be chaos. This is what history shows us fascists do when given the chance to participate in democratic political campaigns: They create chaos. They do it because chaos works to their advantage. They revel in it, because they can see how profoundly chaos unnerves democratic-republicans—everyone, that is, whether liberal or conservative, who believes in the basic idea of a representative government that is built around neutral rules. Fascism exists to pulverize neutral rules.

So they campaign with explicit intention to instill a sense of chaos. And then comes the topper: They have the audacity to insist that the only solution to the chaos—that they themselves have either grossly exaggerated or in some cases created!—is to vote for them: “You see, there is nothing but chaos afoot, and only we can restore order!”

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    1879-1935

    TIL you guys have been stuck with the same two political parties since the 1850s. No wonder they’ve gone a bit corrupt.

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s what happens with a first past the post voting system. A ranked choice would open things up quite a bit, but that would require the people elected by the first past the post voting system to change it or mass revolution.

      Someone call the French and let them know we actually do need them again.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It must be a proportional system. No other system produces viable 3rd parties.

          • hglman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Canada has effectively the same system as the UK, both being based on fptp, are you suggesting that fptp is fine in a preliminary system?

            • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’ve campaigned for an NDP candidate who was against fptp as many of us are, even our current PM ran on replacing fptp which never happened of course… however we have more than 2 “viable” parties despite not having proportional representation. You can apply definitions to “viable” at your will but they have won provinces quite recently and have many seats in federal and provincial government.