• Quokka@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope she loses.

    No one should “own” words or concepts.

        • sirdorius@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s ideologically cool and all, but in today’s reality megacorps will be getting paid for the labor of others which get nothing in return and will further accelerate the divide of wealth.

          • Quokka@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, nah.

            We need to weaken these copyright and ownership notions one fight at a time.

            You won’t get to tomorrow if you settle for today.

              • Quokka@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                And it helps the big guy own everything our culture has produced.

                We’re not even entitled to use the culture of our age freely because it’s all held by a handful of companies.

                • LexiconDexicon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So you hate the “Big Guy” but you also hate independent workers like Sarah for wanting to protect their IP? You’re making no sense here and just contradicting yourself between posts

            • sirdorius@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh so settling for giant corporations using AI to plagiarize other’s work without liability is getting us to a better tomorrow? Interesting

                • rambaroo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh sure I bet the corporations will get right on giving up their ip so that they’re on the same page as the rest of us.

                  • Quokka@quokk.au
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They will never give up anything, we’ll have to take it back.

    • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So why are you ok with openai being paid for taking work from other people that you don’t think should be paid? If she loses, then that’s the situation.

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So change the system that lets them be paid for, don’t paywall human culture and let that system continue.

        You’re picking the wrong target here.

        • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The system exists. We all have to live with it. Or change it, but this case won’t do that and you’re effectively siding with big tech over authors.

      • jgardner10@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because you can freely say something doesn’t mean I have to forced to listen to it.

        • mrmanager@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          And that means that the words cannot be used, which means they are not owned by you. If you could use them, you would own them right?

          • Cail@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            But the words can be used, just not in that specific space. If you’re not allowed to bring a gun to a restaurant it doesn’t mean the restaurant suddenly owns the bullets.

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a completely unrelated topic.

        You’re talking about censorship, I’m talking about ownership.