The Hollow Knight wiki community is another in a long line of wiki communities choosing to leave Fandom behind. But why is that? What is it about Fandom that...
    • simple@lemm.eeOPEnglish
      2481·
      1 year ago

      The video pretty much describes why Fandom is so bad and why many games are moving their wikis to alternative services, and why you should stop using it in general. Some examples include:

      • Ads everywhere, including autoplaying video ads that play another ad when they’re done. There are also ads sneakily inserted in the middle of articles that are related to the wiki, like a Gamespot review (Gamespot is owned by Fandom)

      • A sidebar you can’t remove that promotes their content

      • Fandom hijacked the community’s Mcdonald’s wiki to turn it into a giant advertisement

      • Accounts that are 4 days old can bypass restrictions and easily vandalize pages

      • Fandom sometimes introduces things nobody wants, such as AI generated answers that are usually wrong, take up the top half of the page, and with no way for wiki admins to remove it. They removed it after a lot of backlash but still…

      • When people fork their wikis to other sites, fandom refuses to let admins delete their old wikis. This makes new wikis difficult to start because Fandom usually ends up as the top result on search engines, even if they’re old abandoned wikis.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.todayEnglish
        7·
        1 year ago

        Seems like on that last one someone could go through and change all the content in every page to a link to the new wiki. A PIA? Certainly, but at least it would get the ball rolling and use the built up SEO from fandom to help your new site get views.

        • ysjet@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately they just use a bot to revert those. You’re not allowed to truly migrate off fandom, all you can do is fork your own data and try to out-SEO the fandom wiki, because as soon as you put it.on fandom, fandom owns it too.

          • Paradachshund@lemmy.todayEnglish
            7·
            1 year ago

            I wonder if you could use a bot and AI to write fake information and post that instead. Seems like fandom wouldn’t have enough game specific info to judge the accuracy, especially if it happened over time.

      • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5·
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah… Gamespot, that place existed and it was terrible always. Then you look at the other things Gamespot own and realize they all got butchered in terms of reliability and impact.

      • Zoidsberg@lemmy.caEnglish
        4·
        1 year ago

        Accounts that are 4 days old can bypass restrictions and easily vandalize pages

        What can we do with this information, I wonder…

        • CoderKat@lemm.eeEnglish
          5·
          1 year ago

          The video also calls out that one of the challenges in moving off of fandom is SEO. The fandom sites often are above the new sites even when the fandom site becomes a pile of unmaintained, vandalized garbage. This suggests that vandalism actually helps fandom.

          The best thing we can do is not visit the sites and don’t link to them, instead using and linking to their new sites.

    • NightAuthor@lemmy.worldEnglish
      51·
      1 year ago
      • Hyper aggressive ads
      • Restricted access to moderation and admin features of wiki
      • Restrictions in layout/formatting to maintain compatibility with ad placements
      • Forced addition of an AI generated section in wikis which contained gibberish or straight up wrong information
    • T4UTV1S@lemmy.worldEnglish
      26·
      1 year ago

      Worst TL;DR:

      Fandom is a wiki farm, meaning it hosts a bunch of wikis. Also they run on freely available software mediawiki.

      Fandom has a couple main problems:

      1. Barriers to entry are super low, verification for users takes place 4 days post account creation, with no other steps needed by the user. Paired with the limited options that moderators have for editing access on wikis and you have a wiki that is much tougher to moderate.

      2. Ads. Fandom is for-profit. And that means super obtrusive ads that we’ve come to expect. But fandom also shoved ads in the middle of wiki pages, with admins having no control of where those should be placed. There’s also the matter of sketchy ads that are served to minors. Also, some of the ads are outdated but are for subsidiary companies of Fandom.

      3. The Grimace Incident. Basically Fandom took over and turned the McDonald’s and grimace wikis into huge advertisements, wiping out the hard work that the actual wiki maintainers did. They also put in a bunch of factually incorrect information, literally going against the whole purpose of a wiki and really worrying other wikis, because what’s stopping Fandom from getting paid again and repeating the event with their wikis?

      I’m sure I glossed over a bunch of the details but that’s the best I can do from memory.

        • H1jAcK@lemm.eeEnglish
          124·
          1 year ago

          Sorry, that’s the best summary I could come up with

          • Ey ich frag doch nur@feddit.deEnglish
            21·
            1 year ago

            Tbh mainly because of dumb content. I grew up with free TV so i understand and can life with some ads if the content can be used for free. Also tbh i still sometimes use it for music and that one video gaming magazine’s channel that i really like.

            I feel like I’ve become somehow allergic to youtubers and such.

  • M500@lemmy.mlEnglish
    902·
    1 year ago

    I loath this site. It’s rarely loads well and the images never load for me. And it’s always so slow. It’s probably because I have an adblocker.

    • Caesium@lemmy.worldEnglish
      24·
      1 year ago

      I have been preaching abandoning it for YEARS. It’s even worse on mobile because the formating is so messed up some links just don’t work. And even without adblock, there’s so many ads that THEY slow down the site. Just because it’s ‘free’ everyone defaults to fandom and I hate it so much

      • M500@lemmy.mlEnglish
        4·
        1 year ago

        I think the Doom community successfully avoided fandom.

        What’s to stop someone else from scraping their site and hosting a better one? I’ve never heard of anyone who actually likes Fandom.

    • at_an_angle@lemmy.oneEnglish
      9·
      1 year ago

      I’ve found the best way to browse Fandom(if necessary) is to use a VPN set to Nordic countries. Ads are very generic and in a language I can’t read. So they are very easy to spot.

        • 10EXP@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          1·
          8 months ago

          Better yet: Try the Indie Wiki Buddy extension. It serves 2 purposes:

          1. It redirects you from fandom wikis to the new official wikis, to which the community has now moved from the fandom one. Also filters out fandom results from search engines only if an independent, more up-to-date alternative exists.
          2. If something is still hosted on fandom with no indie wiki, redirects it to a BreezeWiki instance.

          I use it in combination with wiki.gg redirect, which redirects to newer wikis which aren’t independent, but moved to wiki.gg from fandom.

          Update: IndieWikiBuddy can now redirect to Wiki.gg wikis too, no need for wiki.gg redirect.

    • mrchampion@lemmy.worldEnglish
      510·
      1 year ago

      You could always use Invidious or Piped (instance list here) to avoid using YT directly if you want. You won’t get any ads or anti-adblocker bullshit with Invidious, so I usually use that. I’m not sure about Piped, but it seems good too. Unless your point is to simply stop using YT for anything, in which case just ignore what I said.

      EDIT: To the now 8 of you who downvoted me, just, why? No, seriously, why. If you downvote me, please at least tell me why you are instead of downvoting and leaving. It makes me anxious to think that I was a dick or spreading misinformation or just being rude and not even noticing it, and would much rather have someone say something to me so I can at least know what people don’t like. That’s not to say I would agree with it, I might not, but I’d rather know what the problem is so I can agree or disagree.

      • cyanarchy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        36·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s the fact that not everything needs a 20 minute video. There’s a lot of topics that I’m interested in but skip because I don’t have 20, 30, 40, 60 minutes for it.

        • mrchampion@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          That makes sense. I just thought he had something against Youtube (and for good reason), since he only said “Not watching a YT video” instead of “Not watching a 20min video”.

  • TheNanaimoBarScene@lemmy.caEnglish
    34·
    1 year ago

    I agree with the premise; fandom sucks. But does it really require a 20 minute exposé though?

    I’ve seen a few links to the Indie Wiki Buddy extension page. I’m not too interested in installing a browser extension to find new wikis, but I bookmarked their listing page: https://getindie.wiki/listings/

  • terrehbyte@ani.socialEnglish
    341·
    1 year ago

    An extension called Indie Wiki Buddy can also help with this by helping direct you to known alternatives to fandom for specific franchises or falling back to Breezewiki-based instances that rehost Fandom content without all of the Fandom bloat. It also provides this filtering and hinting to search results too, so you don’t have to change your workflow too much to use it.

  • w3dd1e@lemm.eeEnglish
    341·
    1 year ago

    TLDR; Fandom has a lot of QAnon articles written to make the scams seem legitimate to less computer savvy people.

    My mom has fallen in a Qanon conspiracy world. The people from that world write Fandom articles about themselves to make it seem legitimate. I found them when I started investigating these people trying to convince her to steer clear.

    I don’t trust a single thing on Fandom anymore.

  • Smacks@lemmy.worldEnglish
    26·
    1 year ago

    I’ve always advocated against using Fandom. Not much customization and so many ads it makes the platform downright unusable.

    A much better alternative is Wiki.gg, created by some of the original founders of Fandom.

  • xvlc@feddit.deEnglish
    271·
    1 year ago

    You might have heard of alternative frontends to services such as YouTube (Piped, Invidious), X/Twitter (Nitter), etc.

    Something similar exists for Fandom: Breezewiki. This instance seems to occasionally result in errors, other instances seem to work more reliable.

  • Flax@feddit.ukEnglish
    24·
    1 year ago

    Mfw you want to check some quick Minecraft details and you get a pop up then half your screen covered with one video. Thank heavens that they created minecraft.wiki as a wiki is basically essential for playing that game.

  • mana@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
    262·
    1 year ago

    This is one of the main reasons I use Kagi. I have sites like fandom and fextralife blocked in my search results.

    One of the things I miss about early internet years was all the independent fan sites and forums people had. Now, so much is just posted to these garbage platforms that control everything.

    • Jarmer@slrpnk.netEnglish
      6·
      1 year ago

      and recently the AI written garbage “gamer” websites have become a problem as well. You can tell instantly that some ai just collected and regurgitated a bunch of text that doesn’t even make sense.

      Now I pretty much stick just to the fan created wikis. Stuff like bg3.wiki and uesp.net

    • janAkali@lemmy.oneEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      I use Metager instead - it’s FOSS and also has an option to filter out choosen domains from the search results.

      • mana@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
        4·
        1 year ago

        Fextralife embeds their twitch stream into their site, artificially inflating their twitch viewer numbers, which in turn hurts smaller streamers since fextralife will be sorted first by viewer count.

      • val@infosec.pubEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        They game SEO to flood search results with articles that are pure, useless placeholders which most of the time will never be written. Even when they’re more than a placeholder page, they’re often wrong outside of a few games because they’re just there to get clicks. Downvote bots were used against links to competing wikis, and while Fextralife denies it, they were conveniently spared.

        There is more shady behavior out there around Fextra, but the most important thing for a user is there is almost always a better wiki that’s being suppressed in the search results. If you blacklist the site you’re a lot more likely to find something useful.

          • val@infosec.pubEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            Still haven’t gotten around to playing Elden Ring so I don’t know if there are better alternatives.

  • Vipsu@lemmy.worldEnglish
    263·
    1 year ago

    Fandom hosts a lot of wikis for long forgotten nich’e games and with these games there usually isn’t enough interest to move to another wiki. When it comes to these wikis theres rarely if ever a team behind updating the wiki and more often than not the content is just being updated and maintained by random invidividuals who just happen to be engaging with the content at given time. The very low barrier of entry makes this possible as you don’t really need to join a team to edit pages or even coordinate with other people.

    When playing one of these games I like to record and share some my observations and findings about games mechanics etc but more often than not the only wiki I can find is fandom wiki that is either incomplete and possibly even abandoned. I cant be bothered to create my own Wiki for these games so I’ll just start editing that one instead because it’s easy, the foundation is usually already there and I don’t need to bother taking any sort of responsibility/mantle of maintainer or admin.

    While Fandom may not be the most optimal choice and there may be better ways to host wiki out there its still better than some obnoxious google document or poorly formatted steam guide that no one else can edit.

      • Vipsu@lemmy.worldEnglish
        46·
        1 year ago

        All too common within attention economy for people to go for the more popular choice.
        Search engine algorithms tend to make things even worse.

        But there are games out there that might not even have wikis if Fandom didn’t make the barrier of entry so low.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.oneEnglish
          74·
          1 year ago

          What games are so small as to not be capable of generating a non fandom wiki, but are large enough that the wiki is not completely empty and factually incorrect?

              • Vipsu@lemmy.worldEnglish
                32·
                1 year ago

                The problem is that the content is already in wiki fandom and there are no contributors invested/interested enough to migrate all the information to alternative wiki. These fandom wikis have no teams just random individuals making contributions of various sizes.

                If I do ever get invested enough to a game to actually create a wiki I’ll definately use something else than fandom.

  • umbrella@lemmy.mlEnglish
    308·
    1 year ago

    no such thing as ethical consumption under capitalism.

    we have to use a decentralized open alternative (like lemmy) to take back control, switching to a proprietary solution by yet another company will only delay the problem further.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      17·
      1 year ago

      Or we could just… host our own wikis. There’s plenty of open source software for them. It’s not hard. Not everything needs to be federated.

      • umbrella@lemmy.mlEnglish
        32·
        1 year ago

        that was my suggestion, sort of.

        it can be bigger than that too ofc.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zipEnglish
      10·
      1 year ago

      decentralized open alternative (like lemmy) to take back control

      which unfortunately still require capital to run

      • umbrella@lemmy.mlEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        of course it does.

        and better if that capital comes from a network of companies/volunteers instead of one monolithic corporation that can just bully everyone into their will.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldEnglish
      101·
      1 year ago

      no such thing as ethical consumption under capitalism.

      There was a time, long ago, where companies actually cared about their customers, and wanted to sell them good products while making a profit, and they strived for the win - win, and the “customer is always right” philosophy. They took their fair share, and they didn’t triy to squeeze every last dime out of their customers with crappy products.

      Not that that they were saints by any stretch of the imagination (there were definitely bad players back then too) but there used to be a sense of ethics with Capitalism, in America at least, a sense of products being warrantied to work the way they should be and advertised as how they would actually work.

      I have no effing idea how to get back to that state, as it seems like the “lunch for wimps” crowd are running the c-suites these days.

      • umbrella@lemmy.mlEnglish
        31·
        1 year ago

        No way of going back to that state unless we start from scratch, power is too consolidated as it is. And capitalism would soon evolve back to something like this eventually anyway.

        We are on late stage capitalism now, as predicted by Marx.

        e: also those better times werent that good either if you werent white/from somewhere rich, not long ago kids were working in coal mines.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.caEnglish
        42·
        1 year ago

        Regulation. Take the money out of governing, both national government and private directors. If someone makes decisions that affect many people, make that person accountable, either through a competitive market or a functioning justice system.

        The problem is that the fantastically efficient tool that is capitalism will try to increase it reach as much as possible. Killing competition and undermining laws will always be the end goal, so long as they are in anyway allowed.

        The reason companies used to care is because not caring drove customers to the competition. But then there was no competition, and the care evaporated. As long as they are allowed, they will take. Civility can only be guaranteed if profits are on the line.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zipEnglish
        34·
        1 year ago

        We can’t just get out of capitalism, but you can work to improve your situation. If you have a yard, grow a garden.

        Also, see if there’s a mutual aid group in your area, and if not consider talking with your neighbors about what you can do to help each other out. One person might be good with car Maintanance. Another might be a good gardener. Everyone can contribute something.

        • umbrella@lemmy.mlEnglish
          3·
          1 year ago

          Gardening will not solve the climate crisis because it won’t offset the millions of tons of co2 being emitted.

          It would help, sure, but we have to radically change production to stop it. Currently the rich own those, so the best we can do short of removing them is plead.

          Also yes, you can’t just get rid of capitalism, history shows it takes years/decades of planning and organizing. Start as soon as possible because I don’t think we have all that much time.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zipEnglish
            3·
            1 year ago

            Where did I say it would solve the climate crisis? I was just having an alternative to capitalism to provide some of your food. Of course it won’t dismantle capitalism or save the world. People have been gardening forever, yet here we are. It’s just a step you can take to take some control over your situation back.

            • umbrella@lemmy.mlEnglish
              1·
              1 year ago

              Never said I would’nt do it either. I’d love to grow my own food over pesticide garbage we have in supermarkets here. I just don’t have any land at all, and there isnt any in a pretty big radius around me.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zipEnglish
                1·
                1 year ago

                That’s fair. Most people don’t. You can probably still grow some food if you have access to a balcony even. It won’t be much, but it can offset some of your reliance on purchasing it.

                Also, again, look into mutual aid groups around you. There may be someone who does have space for a garden and produces more than they can consume. Maybe you have some skill or ability that could help them and get some food in return.

  • dx1@lemmy.worldEnglish
    20·
    1 year ago

    I got special Stylish CSS blocking half the shit on Fandom. IDK about any politics about them but the site is borderline unusable.