For example.
But honestly I was more joking. The thing that makes most projects useful is the developers developing it, and they can’t clone that
Creator of LULs (a script which helps links to point to your instance)
Come say hi here or over at https://twitch.tv/AzzuriteTV :) I like getting to know more people :)
Play games with me: https://steamcommunity.com/id/azzu
For example.
But honestly I was more joking. The thing that makes most projects useful is the developers developing it, and they can’t clone that
They’re not supposed to, it’s just about blocking them from using the software :)
The real solution is to include a few tiananmenSquare
variables in all the repositories. Either they exclude the entire repository or just the specific file, in either case the entire project may be unusable.
With Proton, a large majority of games run on Linux, and most even better than on windows.
The question is, how many people spent as much time and gathered as much knowledge as you trying to break LLMs? If it’s not accessible to the majority, it might as well not exist.
Huh I thought I’ve been downloading stuff with ipfs from them the whole time
What would theoretically happen if they refused?
A repetition of the truth is always valuable. Not everyone fully understands how broken our society is. Even if just 0.1% read the comment and understand something new, it was valuable. Even if it’s just a reminder, it was valuable.
On the other hand, your comment is not valuable 100% of the time. Complaining about something generally true being there, which you could just ignore if you already know it, is absolutely useless. In fact, it’s even negative value, because if your complaint was followed and someone came to the thread without the knowledge, they’d be denied an opportunity to learn.
Are you a bot? This answer is so generic and not even addressing OP.
Any piracy costing money is also really really likely to be shut down relatively soon, making you need to change your setup.
Obviously you are completely alone in your fifties being single, everyone else is in happy relationships.
If the sarcasm wasn’t clear, it’s literally never too late.
Honestly I can’t see why you’d choose average, non-wealthy. If you want quiet and peaceful, you’re sure to get it when wealthy, just pay for a large residence and security on the outskirts, then stay inside. Use disguises/body doubles when going out. Except for a little organizational overhead, which you can also pay people to do for you, you can have everything you want when you’re famous and wealthy.
I have no idea how selection works anywhere else, since I only ever used gimp.
For me, I don’t understand this meme, selection seems to work very intuitively, it seems to do what I expect it to do.
But the thing is, we don’t need to develop products. New products are just further resource usage, more greenhouse gasses, more “infinite growth”. Also, a company or individual having “an edge” in competition by developing something first is simply waste of resources. Now only they are allowed to improve upon it, make it more efficient, whatever. If this didn’t exist, yea they’d be incentivized less to create it in the first place, but also now everyone could take it and make it better.
We have to go away from thinking as individuals in the direction of thinking as humanity.
Doesn’t a SpaceX engineer technically already have a sugar daddy?
I usually have so little oil left I just put enough dish soap in that it all mixes with water… Does that still clog my pipes?
Forget that, you guys have a stove or a barbecue? I have no place to burn anything
Any new client doesn’t get old messages. Phone only allows the possibility of transferring a backup, which desktop doesn’t have.
Maybe what will make you understand, is that 1. the black part is also bad, just a different flavor of it, 2. those two things can be separate issues that are both problematic, not one being right, one being wrong and 3. the DDR was never really communism, like most “communist” countries (like current “communist” China is almost entirely capitalistic)
Also what no one has said yet, if you put two identical people next to each other, same mindset, same character, same visuals etc etc, but the one is wealthy and the other is poor, for 99% of people the wealthier one is more sexually attractive. Our brains view access to resources as a desirable quality.
And so, why would a rom com that is literally supposed to be about attractive people, make them purposefully less attractive? There’s basically no reason.