• bremen15@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Its slop if its useless or wrong. If it is i will come back and edit it. I need to test it first.

    • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I guess if people want to read answers generated by an LLM, they would just ask one.

    • Madrigal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The anti-AI morons on Lemmy can’t or won’t tell the difference. They think “slop” is just a term for any LLM-generated (or refined) content. There’s no nuance to their thinking at all. They don’t assess the quality of the information provided or how the tool is actually being used.

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Given the sources don’t really back up the content, I think it’s safe to say this is slop. You should probably proof AI slop before you white knight it next time.

        • Madrigal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The question was about document management systems that can be run in docker. The LLM response listed four document management systems that can be run in docker.

          Was it a perfect response? No.

          Was it a useful response? Yes.

          Was it a better contribution to the discussion than yours? Lol.