• thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Given the sources don’t really back up the content, I think it’s safe to say this is slop. You should probably proof AI slop before you white knight it next time.

    • Madrigal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The question was about document management systems that can be run in docker. The LLM response listed four document management systems that can be run in docker.

      Was it a perfect response? No.

      Was it a useful response? Yes.

      Was it a better contribution to the discussion than yours? Lol.

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The current thread is about AI slop, not DMS. You helped create the branch we’re on. You said “people on Lemmy can’t tell slop from useful info.” I said “this is AI slop because the sources don’t match,” assuming that I wouldn’t have to explain the hallucinations (fabrications is a bit better here) because that usually comes with slop. Since the current thread is about whether or not slop is meaningful, I have no idea what you added by saying “hey I attacked someone for not liking AI then attacked someone else for a refutation of the AI that I was white knighting.”