The Supreme Court on June 27 upheld a Texas law requiring pornographic websites verify users are at least 18, in a case that pitted concerns about protecting minors against worries about violating the First Amendment rights of adults.

The court split 6-3 along ideologically grounds with the three liberal justices dissenting.

Eighteen other, largely conservative states have enacted similar laws in recent years as access toa growing cache of online pornography has exploded and the material has become more graphic.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 小时前

    I’m doing my part by buying pornographic magazines and distributing them at local schools. I tried handing out flash drives, but the kids had too much training against plugging in a drive of unknown origin to prevent against malware. Analog porn is also sorta retro, so that’s fun.

    /it’s a joke, stupid

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 小时前

      Speaking of. Why aren’t you potheads flinging truckloads of seeds along the nation’s roads and highways?! We should be neck-deep in high-quality ditchweed at every corner by now!

      And another thing! How come I can’t get no Tang around here?

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 小时前

    This could all be solved with some zero knowledge proof technology so they can just prove your age and gain absolutely no tracking capabilities, but of course that will never happen.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        43 分钟前

        Its a cryptographic way of verifying something without having to expose the information it’s verifying.

        Lets say you need to prove you’re over the age of 18

        You can have a digital ID that has your birthdate on it.

        Through some fancy cryptographic stuff I can’t explain, the website could challenge your ID to prove your age, and the ID could return a response that proves you are over 18, but it doesn’t need to actually give your name or age in response, and it’s response isn’t something that can be linked back to your ID.

        Now simply having an ID isn’t necessarily enough, kids could just take someones ID, so it might need to have some biometic’s added and be a small piece of hardware that has the digital ID, so when the website challenges the ID, you unlock the ID with your fingerprint, and now the website knows the owner of that ID is the user of the ID, and they are 18 or older.

        For this to work though you’d need someone who has authority on your age to implement the digital ID properly, and then write the software that will validate things.

        So you could go to the DMV as an example, they issue you a license while you’re there, you authenticate the ID with your finger print (but they DMV doesn’t get your fingerprint, it’s just stored on the ID) and then the website can challenge the ID and get a response that verifies you’re old enough, without verifying who you are, or your age.

  • Cuberoot@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 小时前
    1. I’m old enough to legally view any form of pornography that’s legal to create.

    2. There is no legitimate government interest in monitoring my pornographic habits.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 小时前

      We’re a ways off from that, simply because VPNs have too much business utility.

      But we’re definitely moving in the direction of “Everyone who uses the internet has to show their ID first” as a means of tracking the bulk of retail web surfing.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 小时前

          Not if you’re just renting a server in a foreign country with different privacy laws and rolling your own VPN.

          Also some VPNs allow payment with cryptocurrency.

          Mullvad, for instance, accepts Monero, Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Bitcoin Lightning.

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 小时前

              True, but if you use a VPN and don’t use their DNS (and especially if you set up a recursive DNS server of your own) they have a lot less information about what you do online.

              • dan@upvote.au
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 小时前

                don’t use their DNS

                As long as you use encrypted DNS, like DoH (DNS over HTTPS). Regular DNS is unencrypted, so the ISP can trivially collect data even if you use a custom recursive server (either your own or a public one like Cloudflare, Quad9, etc).

                Running a recursor on a VPS then querying it using DoH seems like a reasonable approach to me. I’ve got an AdGuard Home server on my home network that uses DoH for all upstream DNS queries, but I’m currently just using Quad9 rather than my own recursor.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 小时前

      Probably going to see an uprise in things like lorawan or consumer-owned mesh networks.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    5 小时前

    Maybe if you so-called prudish fucks ever had an ounce of self-control it wouldn’t be exploding so much, would it?

    It’s just like how the places with the most anti-trans sentiment consume the most trans pornography. It’s all about removing the temptation because they have zero self control. “I can’t be trusted to not spend every waking moment jerking off because deep down I’m a filthy depraved fucking cretin, so I must take away joy from everyone else who might use pornography responsibly!”

    Especially now, when Palantir is making a giant database on US citizens from Federal government data, why would anyone feel comfortable identifying themselves to a pornography site? To be on some list someday that will be used by the religious police to jail you for the crime of jerking off to the “wrong” thing? Give me a break.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 小时前

      On the other hand, jerk off as much as you want to. Jerking off doesn’t hurt anyone, go for it.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 小时前

    Time to start finding woods porn again. Maybe this time USB drives scattered in the underbrush.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 小时前

    So, keep up geoblocking the Idiot State, with a page listing all those politicians and judges who caused this.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 小时前

      A good idea in theory, but something tells me that somebody logging into PornHub isn’t exactly going to be receptive to politics at that particular moment.