• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Which part of comparing incarceration rates do you take issue with? Why is acknowledging the difference “mindless?”

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          54 minutes ago

          That’s all this post was about, though, a comparison showing that per capita (and totally), incarceration rates in the PRC is far lower than in the US Empire. The purpose is to highlight the hypocricy of those who hold the PRC as more repressive than the US Empire, when the opposite is abundantly clear to anyone looking at hard metrics such as incarceration rates.

          You decided to make a pivot in a completely different direction and just complain about Marxists, which just screams that you want attention more than anything. I suppose I’m providing that for you if that’s what you want, but really it’s just good practice to call out the incoherence of anti-communists.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The trick is to always assume “China is lying about its internal statistics” and inflate whatever number they give by an arbitrary large percentage. 1.7M is obviously an under-count because the CCP is always lying about everything.

      Also, you can do some broad brush “Everyone in Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, North Korea, and Taiwan are prisoners of the Chinese state, so actually that’s over 60M people” napkin math to make the numbers look better.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        56 minutes ago

        I think this is a good rule of thumb in general. When statistics agree with my preconceived notions, I consider them trustworthy, and if not, I assume that reality lines up with what I expect. For example, the referendum in held in the Baltics about leaving the USSR ended in favor of leaving, which I think is a good example of a trustworthy statistic. But the subsequent referendum in the remaining members ended in favor of staying in the USSR, and I think that’s a little suspicious, don’t you?

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          Why would it be suspicious? Different members of the USSR had different national conditions, some were quite nationalist and opposed being a part of the USSR, some were more internationalist and wished to retain the Soviet system. In the following years, there have been many studies verifying that of those who lived through Socialism, the majority wish it had remained over the devastation Capitalism brought to the majority of people.

          • wpb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            44 minutes ago

            It’s suspicious because it disagrees with my preconceived notions about communism.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              42 minutes ago

              The opening of the Soviet Archives backs up these claims. If your pre-concieved notions about Communism are negative, I really recommend giving Blackshirts and Reds a read if you’ve got the time and willingness.

              • wpb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                36 minutes ago

                See now there you’ve made a crucial error. You’re recommending a book which, while it has some criticism of the specifics of how the USSR implemented socialism, on the whole it’s quite positive about the idea of establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat in general. Obviously that disagrees with my preconceived notion that humans are greedy, and that therefore capitalism is good, so I would never read a source that contradicts this, because I would have to dismiss most of it outright. And that’s just a hassle.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  32 minutes ago

                  I don’t follow, the author being positive about the working class running society rather than privledged elites having dictatorial control a la Capitalism doesn’t mean you need to dismiss the facts it brings up outright. Are you saying that, as someone biased towards Capitalism, you dismiss any criticism of Capitalism and any positive opinions on Socialism outright? If so, I can’t imagine how you live your life in other areas that contradict your current understanding!

                  To return, I don’t at all believe it’s suspect that the majority of people wished to retain Socialism, and this fact is further cemented by this same general notion being repeated over and over again in polling.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        No, Occupied China doesn’t control DPRK or ROC

        If we play that game we can’t trust American numbers either so the whole conversation becomes pointless

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m sure he hasn’t got a clue how many Chinese there are, or where China is.
        All that matters is China bad, commie bad

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Per capita is misleading, it over represents low populations and under represents high populations

        When you use it, it makes Canadian cities appear more violent than American cities as an example

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Per Capita shows that China has a lower total prison population than a country much smaller than it in population. Both per capita and total counts are lower in the PRC despute having several times the population.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              3 hours ago

              What people feel to be true is often very different from what is actually true. You will not get anywhere by arguing with tankies, they’re not unlike MAGA.

              • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Blue MAGA denying facts, literally the actual numbers and think that we just “feel’ it’s true” are pretty much the same as MAGA.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                What’s your point, here? Marxists are bad because China has a higher population, meaning per capita comparisons are more accurate when directly comparing with the US?

                • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I haven’t said Marxists are bad, I’ve agreed that China is bad.

                  Are you planning on living in China?

        • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And yet, the USA still the 5th highest in incarceration numbers and the highest in absolute numbers.

          I’d say that tells you enough

    • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      Worthwhile note to people too lazy to click on the link is that this is the 2021 version. In June 2024 (which is linked at the top of the linked article) the numbers look a little different but not much better for the US.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s too hilarious it can’t be intentional that the top country not America is El Salvador which is where you’re questionably sending all your black and brown people.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Interesting how it’s southern states at the top eh?

      Can’t have anything to do with the fact that the US legally allows prisoner slavery right?

      Winder what the race ratio of the prison population is.

      This is the country routinely accusing other countries of having “prison camps.”

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Interesting how it’s southern states at the top eh?

        Legit amazed California wasn’t higher on the list. They’ve been doing mass-incarceration at an industrial scale since the 70s. But I guess the population is big enough that the per-capita statistics work out.

        States like Alabama, Louisiana, and Oklahoma have such small and anemic populations and dedicate so much of their domestic budget to incarceration that they’re basically giant publicly subsidized slave plantations.

        • sexy_peach@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I thought the states were being compared to other countries. Didn’t look properly on the phone.

            • sexy_peach@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Yes but that doesn’t really say much. We know it’s bad in the US. If all German states were bad that would still only tell you that in average it’s bad in Germany

              • pyre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                not really. the fact that Louisiana has nearly double the rate of Oregon is significant. so is the fact that racist southern states are at the top and are the ones beating the us average.

          • LwL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            They are, and I agree it’s misleading. It’s implying that it’s somehow shocking that the individual states of the county with the highest incarceration rate in the world also have a high incarceration rate. If it was absolute numbers, it would maybe make a point. As it is, it’s stating the extremely obvious and framing it as “look, it’s even worse than you thought”.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              If it was absolute numbers, it would maybe make a point.

              If you have a population with 10M people and 20,000 of them are prisoners, that’s significantly less concerning than a country with 100,000 people of which 10,000 are prisoners. You can’t make an apples-to-apples comparison between Texas and Wyoming with raw head-count.

              it’s somehow shocking that the individual states of the county with the highest incarceration rate in the world also have a high incarceration rate

              It’s shocking that the state of Louisiana has a full 2% of its population in jail. That’s twice the US national baseline.

              • LwL@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 minutes ago

                Yes, but that is not how the graph is framed. It’s framed as “look, if we put US states on a graph with other countries, they have such a high incarceration rate that there are almost no countries even on the graph!”

                If it was honest and just trying to compare the incarceration rate of US states amongst each other (and the national average) it wouldn’t be titled “[…] in U.S. states and all countries […]”. It’s a clearly manipulative title.

                The reason that a graph with this title could maybe make a point if it was absolute numbers is that most U.S. states’ population is less than most countries, so if individual states were still high on such a graph, that would be shocking.

            • Hackworth@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              It shows which US states contribute more to the US incarceration rate and clearly shows that even those that contribute the least are above the majority of the nations’ incarceration rates. The latter is not obvious without visualizing the data in this way.

      • maniclucky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        How is a per-capita incarceration rate, with a reference to the superset included directly on the plot, misleading? Other than including more than El Salvador for the sake of external reference, which is almost certainly a size issue.

        • sexy_peach@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I thought the states were being compared to other countries. Didn’t look properly on the phone.

          • then_three_more@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            They are (which is the point) the countries are in orange USA (as an overall average) and el Salvador are the only countries that make it on to the list.

            • sexy_peach@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Well yes because the US as a whole has a high number. If you added cities they would have even more in the high numbers. What’s the point about that?

              • maniclucky@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Because US states have populations and areas comparable to other countries. Just the US topping the charts is expected. How many states you have to get through to see other countries is interesting.

                • sexy_peach@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  See? This makes it look like it’s as misleading as I said. This is prisoners per 100.000, that means it doesn’t matter how populous a state or country is. That’s exactly why comparing states with countries is misleading. For every state that has a higher number than the US average there’s states that have a lower number.

  • godlessworm [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    UHHH THATS JUST BECAUSE CHINA IS LYING HAHAA YOU REALLY BELIEVE THEIR OWN NUMBERS LOL??? oh third parties provided that data…. UHH WELL THEY DONT HAVE IPHONES AND THEYRE ALL POOR. oh… wait, they do have iphones now and china has a stronger middle working class than the US and canada?

    hold on i need to go watch my tv for a couple hours to get a few more talking points but im gonna come back to this post and fucking own you

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      CHINA ONLY PRODUCES GARBAGE BTW. oh what? They have actually quality products, they just ship out cheap garbage to suckers?

  • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    23 hours ago

    One is labeled as authoritarian dystopia while the other as a beacon of freedom, it’s like we live in the upside down.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’m not saying the US isn’t shit with for profit prisons, but I’m not believing shit for any number that China provides on pretty much anything.

    • veganbtw@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Interesting because the number comes from the Institute for Criminal Research and not China, but go on with your total and complete acceptance of US propaganda and unfound hatred of China.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      To be fair, China is 2nd in overall prison population by country globally, so it’s not like their numbers are complete bs. I’m sure there is some fudging in what constitutes as a “prisoner” when they have “re-education camps” though. That said, the US’s numbers are fucking insane.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The rest are in undeclared labor camps

      Goes for both

      US labor camps are not undeclared (though extraterritorial black sites are). They’re called prisons, and the labor is slave labor, thanks to the 13th amendment.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The previous user is a bit off base with the labor camps idea (not to say that the Xinjiang detention camps for Uyghurs aren’t widely known), but it is worth noting that China does utilize administrative detentions/行政拘留 for smaller offenses which are kept statistically separate from prison counts.

        If Raiden needs a source, the law covering administrative detentions can be reviewed here:

        https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-01/23/content_5582030.htm

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          but it is worth noting that China does utilize administrative detention

          Isn’t that the same as Jails in the US which is separate from prison statistics?

          Jail is where you go for the night when arrested for disorderly conduct and are released the next day.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Administrative detentions can be longer. On paper they can hold you about a month, but it can be longer than that with a judge’s signoff if they have proof of a crime.

            This is typically where the police try to get you to confess to something and drag it out as long and uncomfortably as possible until you do, after which you either get to go free (though you end up on a list for a long time) or you may go to a “black jail”/黑監獄 which is a sort of under-the-table prison.

            The terms of release can also sometimes require completion of a rehabilitation program, which is often the voluntary alternative to prison, or getting transferred to a short stay detention center for a few months to perform community service.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Administrative detentions can be longer. On paper they can hold you about a month, but it can be longer than that with a judge’s signoff if they have proof of a crime.

              And in the US, jail can be up to just short of a year.

              This is typically where the police try to get you to confess to something and drag it out as long and uncomfortably as possible until you do, after which you either get to go free (though you end up on a list for a long time) or you may go to a “black jail”/黑監獄 which is a sort of under-the-table prison.

              The terms of release can also sometimes require completion of a rehabilitation program, which is often the voluntary alternative to prison, or getting transferred to a short stay detention center for a few months to perform community service.

              So pretty similar to the US.

              • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                And in the US, jail can be up to just short of a year.

                I’d like to point out, ‘proper’ jail, for misdemeanor level offenses, is ‘up to a year,’ but I personally know individuals who have been in jail (where people awaiting trial stay, in addition to people convicted of misdemeanors) for over three years now, still waiting on their trial.

              • Stovetop@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Yeah, the justice system in the US is pretty fucked up. Provably so, with plenty of data made publicly available to back it up.

    • veganbtw@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Source: The US propaganda you received and believe uncritically.

      What’s next, you explaining their inherent need to lie because of their race?