• last_philosopher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I think genetic engineering is the most high-potential tech right now. They’re already using it to cure sickle cell, and my (total non-expert, probably way too hopeful) pipe dream is that we could basically treat it like we can open a terminal on the body some day and change whatever we want.

    Edit: I just want to point out that I’m imagining curing cancer, reversing aging, etc. Not like, additional orifices or anything.

  • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Most of the stuff in Jules Verne’s books, even Paris in the Twentieth Century.

    (Well, the moon gun would need to be a very long railgun, not a gunpowder cannon, if you want crewed capsules, but still.)

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    A lot of black mirror stuff.

    Apologies for the blanket pessimism but the last decades darkened my view.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’d really like to at least see humanity fully switch to clean energy in my lifetime but I’m losing hope.

    I should already be able to take a self-driving flying taxi to work. I should already be able to vacation on the moon. We shouldn’t be burning stuff to power all our modern tech.

    I grew up on 80s/90s scifi. I hope humanity can get it’s shit together and that the current anti-intellectualism phase we’re in is just part of a larger cycle.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Flying taxis won’t happen, way too many risks, even in the future, never mind the horrors of having your skies full of that crap.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        We have auto-pilots for planes, those are mostly fine. People are the problem. I dont trust humans to operate motor vehicles in 2 dimensions, let alone 3…

        • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          To be fair, you have a 1 in 95 chance of dying in an automobile accident.

          Based on modern safety standards for everything else, that’s unacceptable.

          If I offered you a job and said you have a 1 in 95 chance of dying from working this job, you would refuse. The most dangerous job in the USA is logging, with about a 1 in 1000 chance of dying. More lumberjacks die driving home than die working their extremely dangerous job.

          Not only should we have self-driving flying taxis by now, but we should also at least have level 5 self-driving cars so people aren’t constantly dying driving to get groceries or pick up their kids.

          • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Obviously I know how they work, I saw it in a documentary about Airplanes. The Otto pilot inflates at the press of a button (or is inflated manually) and they fly the plane.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Exoskeletons like Ripley’s in Alien. We’ve got smaller ones, but I want to pilot a walking fork lift.

    Pipe dream - battlemechs aka mechwarrior (not pacific rim). Very impractical but I want one anyway. Yes, I saw the robot fighting league by Megabots. I have their poster.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ve seen prototypes of these that were very impressive since like a decade ago, so I’m fully expecting those to be here soon. Power supply usually is the biggest issue

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    living in a self-sustaining ecological-aware community that values freedom and diversity and everyone having their needs met

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tricorders, cellphones are already partway there they just need more durable, small sensors like a handheld light spectrometer to tell what things are made of and a handheld interferometer to detect gravity

  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    We currently carry tricorders in our pockets. I can see a medical tricorder being ubiquitous for field medics, ships, and the like within 100 years.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Seems entirely reasonable that a Gattaca future is achievable. Whether desirable is the other question. Somewhere CJ Cherryh is being worshipped as a prophet.

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        Artificial wombs are something that’s often presented as dystopian, but I would imagine would actually be a very good thing. Beyond the obvious help it would be to infertile couples that desired children, they would if commonly adopted eliminate the danger of birth and pregnancy complications, and discomfort associated with the process. Probably not everyone would want to use it, but I’d bet even having the option would mean a lot to a lot of people.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The real downside to artificial wombs is that we may rapidly become dependent on them. Half of pregnancies result in spontaneous abortion. With external gestation that assumedly wouldn’t happen. That’s a hell of a lot of evolutionary pressure which could have all kinds of consequences.