• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    These are broad generalisations but laws need to be broad and general.

    So the solution is to treat all chests and nipples equally. Allow them to be shown, or hide them from everyone, but enforce the rule consistently.

    • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      But in general men and women are different in this area and there’s vastly different reactions to each scenario ie a man having his shirt off vs a woman having her shirt off

        • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Is this really true? I can’t walk around with a flamethrower even though I haven’t used it. The reason is because people don’t feel comfortable with that right?

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Swap flamethrower for gun and you are describing open carry laws. Some states have decided this is legal, others not.

            But the laws do apply equally, independent of gender.

            • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Age of consent laws are applied differently to each gender, it acknowledges differences. Age pension laws acknowledge differences in retirement age. I think we can agree open carry laws make people uncomfortable and that’s why most states and the people in them are sane enough to disagree with them. People would prefer to not know you have a gun and all the angst and discomfort that goes along with it, it’s not so much the issue of the gun itself.

        • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes but decency laws are applied purely because of the reactions they cause. If someone takes a shit down a drain on the street it’s not the littering that bothers me so much. I want there to be a law that can make that stop.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Again, someone has to act indecently. It’s not the reaction that makes something illegal.

            Nudism has already been ruled as not being indecent, this applies equally to males and females.

            I want there to be a law that can make that stop.

            Ah. Now we are getting to your point. You want it to be illegal for someone to offend you. Not going to happen, because it is not practical. Different people will be offended by different things. It’s not a basis for law.

            • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              If nudism (where you are) is not deemed as indecent I completely agree there should never be a law that specifically targets women. That seems obvious. Where I am nudism or more specifically being naked in a public space is deemed as indecent.

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                I think the position we have reached in this discussion is that laws should be equal for everyone, regardless of sex.

                This means that if a society decides naked female nipples/breasts are offensive then it should also apply to males. If male nipples are not offensive then neither are females.