Only in Trump’s America Shiloh Hendricks has raised over $180,000 after a video of her allegedly hurling racist phrases at a five-year-old child went viral. You can watch the video on Instagram www.instagram.com/… but beware, it is infuriating. She...
Except for its how they did things.
Court records show it’s not.
Right, these court records of “someone” saying he is? Or the court records that had a stay of deportation?
The court records where 2 separate judges saw all the evidence, including confidential information which prove his gang affiliation. Not just one judge - 2 separate ones.
The invocation of the illegal alien act overrides the stay of deportation, hence why he was deported.
If a confidential informant, or say an undercover agent inside MS13, says that he is a MS13 member, would you believe it? Would you want that confidential informant or undercover agent to have to blow their cover, their job, and risk their life in order to get a single low level gang member deported?
Except the us isn’t at war, so he shouldn’t have been deported. Trump’s government had no right to deport him based on the stay of deportation, sooooo he shouldn’t have been deported for being a “gang” member because the stay of deportation wouldn’t have happened if he was in ms13.
Except they ruled that they are at war with MS13, so he could lawfully be deported along with all the others.
Already explained - the illegal alien act.
Incorrect. The stay really only happened because he is MS13 - it was given precisely because they concluded that MS13’s rival gang would seek him out and harm him if he was deported.
Whoa! Congress declared a state of war?
Which, again, not at war.
Funny that, i thought ms13 were super dangerous, why would they not only stop him from being deported, but also let him be free,
Alien Enemies Act. Google it.
Alien Enemies Act. Google it.
Because activist judges.
Yes, not at war, nor is there an invasion
Yes again, not at war, nor is there an invasion
Yes activist judges, like the ones who wanted him deported? Or are they only activist judges when it goes against your views?