• Jomega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let me get this straight: you’re a “communist”, but you want working class people to suffer so that you can have a luxury? Okay…

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      No.

      For one art is not a luxury. That is a capitalist myth that tried to keep culture and basic pleasure away from the working class.

      For second I want working class people to be able to produce whatever art they want however they want, without houlier-than-thou elitists telling them they can’t.

      If turning a a picture of you cat into studio ghibli style brings you even a brief modicum of joy, then you go do that and you shouldn’t have people harassing you for doing so.

      • Jomega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        For one art is not a luxury. That is a capitalist myth that tried to keep culture and basic pleasure away from the working class.

        See definition 2a. Art is a luxury.

        If turning a a picture of you cat into studio ghibli style brings you even a brief modicum of joy, then you go do that and you shouldn’t have people harassing you for doing so.

        Except to achieve that joy, you have to steal from people who have to actually work. Gen AI is designed to plagiarize the work of artists for the sake of replacing them. You aren’t siding with the workers, you’re siding with the parasite class.

        Edit: screenshot with less clutter.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I mean, no, even ignoring the whole licencing argument you can just generate you model from explicitly donated data, so it’s not “designed” to plagiarise.