• geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Spare me the details of who conveniently condemns what. I’m looking at the simple facts here.

    They have all been renovated to suddenly look like Han temples and there are videos of Uyghurs protesting it? And there is a Chinese initiative stipulating it? Looks clear cut to me unless you can show me a reason for these mass architectural changes. And so far nobody is able to explain these changes to me.

    And what exactly is the issue with working with religious scholars to harmonize religion with the law?

    France has been doing that since the second the moment they started colonizing Africa. The Liberal classic “Liberte Egalite Egalite but equality means everyone has to act exactly like the French”.

    But to clarify, is your point that China is doing it but you think it’s cool, or is China not doing it?

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      My point is that mosques being remodeled constitutes a sign of human rights violations in and of itself is such a ridiculous stretch even by western standards that you can’t help but laugh at whomever says it with a straight face. To compare it with what the french did is stopping just short of genocide apologia. The french did a whole lot more than remodel some buildings, they completely imposed a foreign religion, taught European supremacist history and civics and, oh, just kind of sort of stole every resource they could at gunpoint and under threat of torture.

      I get that sinophobia is the flavor of the decade and the yellow peril is guilty until proven innocent a hundred times over for westerners, but until you find legitimate proof of human rights violations, you should restrain from making such accusations.