• Grapho@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My point is that mosques being remodeled constitutes a sign of human rights violations in and of itself is such a ridiculous stretch even by western standards that you can’t help but laugh at whomever says it with a straight face. To compare it with what the french did is stopping just short of genocide apologia. The french did a whole lot more than remodel some buildings, they completely imposed a foreign religion, taught European supremacist history and civics and, oh, just kind of sort of stole every resource they could at gunpoint and under threat of torture.

    I get that sinophobia is the flavor of the decade and the yellow peril is guilty until proven innocent a hundred times over for westerners, but until you find legitimate proof of human rights violations, you should restrain from making such accusations.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is not me quoting Radio Free USAID on made up facts and numbers. It is concrete evidence of cultural ereasure and a prime example of how much control the government is exerting over mosques.

      Sure France is and was worse and people can easily point to Israel for actual genocide on Muslims. That does not absolve China of their own very clearly laid out 5year plan which is very open about the forced assimilation of Muslims which too is cutting into their ideology.

      You can’t blame everything on Sinophobia when I am presenting clear evidence. That is Islamophobic. Or does having a building with a dome would make Muslims terrorists?

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        Clear evidence of some mosques being remodelled and party efforts to work with religious leaders to curb the influence of jihadism (which the CIA loves to exploit). Everything else is yellow peril nonsense.